Thornton Madeline, Mann Emily S, Bullington Brooke W, Hartheimer Joline, Arora Kavita Shah, Allison Bianca A
School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Dec;56(4):337-346. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12283. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
Adolescent contraceptive decision-making is influenced by a number of patient and clinician-driven factors. Although the AAP continues to endorse an efficacy-based model of contraceptive counseling, many professional organizations are shifting to a shared decision-making model as the optimal approach for providing unbiased and patient-driven contraceptive counseling. While SDM is intended to reduce the influence of clinician bias, it can exacerbate inequity if a clinician tailors a conversation based on their assumptions of a patient's goals or preferences. In this qualitative study, we explored self-reported contraceptive counseling practices among US-based clinicians who see adolescent patients to assess how these practices create barriers or facilitators to SDM and person-centered contraceptive care.
We interviewed 16 clinicians at the 2022 AAP Annual Meeting who counsel adolescent patients about contraception. We used thematic content analysis to analyze interview transcripts using Dedoose.
We identified six aspects of contraceptive counseling that clinicians commonly employed with adolescent patients. These were: (1) sociodemographic characteristics driving counseling, (2) reliance on tiered effectiveness counseling, (3) initiating counseling conversations using "ask then explain" or "explain then ask" approaches, (4) emphasis on teen pregnancy prevention, (5) the influence of method accessibility on counseling, and (6) parental involvement in decision-making and patient confidentiality. We describe how these themes align with or diverge from each component of the SDM framework.
Clinicians in this study frequently engaged in non-patient-centered techniques during contraceptive counseling with adolescents. These findings can inform practice recommendations to support clinicians in providing high-quality contraceptive counseling using shared decision-making.
青少年避孕决策受到多种患者和临床医生驱动因素的影响。尽管美国儿科学会继续支持基于疗效的避孕咨询模式,但许多专业组织正转向共同决策模式,将其作为提供公正且以患者为导向的避孕咨询的最佳方法。虽然共同决策旨在减少临床医生偏见的影响,但如果临床医生根据对患者目标或偏好的假设来调整谈话内容,可能会加剧不平等。在这项定性研究中,我们探讨了为青少年患者提供咨询的美国临床医生自我报告的避孕咨询做法,以评估这些做法如何对共同决策和以患者为中心的避孕护理造成障碍或促进因素。
我们在2022年美国儿科学会年会上采访了16位为青少年患者提供避孕咨询的临床医生。我们使用主题内容分析法,通过Dedoose分析访谈记录。
我们确定了临床医生在为青少年患者提供避孕咨询时常用的六个方面。这些方面包括:(1)驱动咨询的社会人口学特征,(2)依赖分层有效性咨询,(3)使用“先询问后解释”或“先解释后询问”的方法开启咨询谈话,(4)强调预防青少年怀孕,(5)方法可及性对咨询的影响,以及(6)父母参与决策和患者保密。我们描述了这些主题与共同决策框架的每个组成部分如何一致或不同。
本研究中的临床医生在为青少年提供避孕咨询时经常采用非以患者为中心的技巧。这些发现可为实践建议提供参考,以支持临床医生通过共同决策提供高质量的避孕咨询。