• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Differential associations between experiences of contraceptive care and subsequent contraceptive access and preferences among family planning patients by racial and ethnic identity: Evidence from Arizona, Iowa, and Wisconsin.不同种族和民族认同的计划生育患者中,避孕护理体验与后续避孕方法获取和偏好之间的差异关联:来自亚利桑那州、爱荷华州和威斯康星州的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 11;19(10):e0312111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312111. eCollection 2024.
2
Unfulfilled and method-specific contraceptive preferences among reproductive-aged contraceptive users in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin.亚利桑那州、爱荷华州、新泽西州和威斯康星州育龄期避孕使用者未满足和特定方法的避孕偏好。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun;59(3):e14297. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14297. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
3
History of unintended pregnancy and patterns of contraceptive use among racial and ethnic minority women veterans.少数民族裔女性退伍军人的意外怀孕史和避孕方式使用模式。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;223(4):564.e1-564.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.042. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
4
Racial and ethnic differences in contraceptive use among women who desire no future children, 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth.2006 - 2010年全国家庭成长调查:不打算生育更多子女的女性在避孕措施使用上的种族和民族差异
Contraception. 2015 Jul;92(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
5
Primary and reproductive healthcare access and use among reproductive aged women and female family planning patients in 3 states.三个州育龄妇女和计划生育女性患者的初级和生殖保健服务获取与使用情况。
PLoS One. 2023 May 24;18(5):e0285825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285825. eCollection 2023.
6
Where Do Reproductive-Aged Women Want to Get Contraception?育龄妇女希望在哪里获得避孕措施?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Jun;32(6):657-669. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0406. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
7
Characteristics of Females Who Use Contraception at Coitarche: An Analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth 2006-2010 Database.初次性交时使用避孕措施的女性特征:对2006 - 2010年全国家庭成长调查数据库的分析
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Dec;24(12):972-7. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5219. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
8
Challenges accessing contraceptive care and interest in over-the-counter oral contraceptive pill use among Black, Indigenous, and people of color: An online cross-sectional survey.黑人、原住民及有色人种在获得避孕护理方面面临的挑战以及对非处方口服避孕药使用的兴趣:一项在线横断面调查。
Contraception. 2023 Apr;120:109950. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109950. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
9
Use of Preferred Source of Contraception Among Users of the Pill, Patch, and Ring in the US.美国使用避孕药、贴片和环的女性中首选避孕方法的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2439191. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.39191.
10
Do Adolescent Women's Contraceptive Preferences Predict Method Use and Satisfaction? A Survey of Northern California Family Planning Clients.青春期女性的避孕偏好是否能预测方法的使用和满意度?对北加州计划生育客户的调查。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 May;64(5):640-647. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.10.291. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
"Do You Know What Birth Control Actually Does to Your Body?": Assessing Contraceptive Information on TikTok.《你知道节育实际上对你的身体有什么影响吗?》:评估TikTok上的避孕信息。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70025.
2
Preferred use of contraceptive methods and reasons for non-use: a cross-sectional survey of a sample of Black, Indigenous, and people of colour in the United States.避孕方法的首选及未使用原因:对美国黑人、原住民和有色人种样本的横断面调查
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2494418. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2494418. Epub 2025 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Centering disability visibility in reproductive health care: Dismantling barriers to achieve reproductive equity.将残疾可见性纳入生殖健康护理的中心位置:消除障碍,实现生殖公平。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231197166. doi: 10.1177/17455057231197166.
2
The status of person-centered contraceptive care in the United States: Results from a nationally representative sample.美国以患者为中心的避孕护理现状:基于全国代表性样本的研究结果。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Sep;55(3):129-139. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12245. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
3
Primary and reproductive healthcare access and use among reproductive aged women and female family planning patients in 3 states.三个州育龄妇女和计划生育女性患者的初级和生殖保健服务获取与使用情况。
PLoS One. 2023 May 24;18(5):e0285825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285825. eCollection 2023.
4
Where Do Reproductive-Aged Women Want to Get Contraception?育龄妇女希望在哪里获得避孕措施?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Jun;32(6):657-669. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0406. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
5
Prioritizing patient experience: Validation of the person-centered contraceptive counseling measure as a performance measure.优先考虑患者体验:将以患者为中心的避孕咨询措施作为绩效衡量标准的验证。
Contraception. 2023 Jul;123:110010. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110010. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
6
Meeting Preferences for Specific Contraceptive Methods: An Overdue Indicator.特定避孕方法的使用偏好:一项滞后的指标。
Stud Fam Plann. 2023 Mar;54(1):281-300. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12218. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
7
Access to Preferred Contraceptive Strategies in Iowa: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Effects of Shifts in Policy and Healthcare Contexts.爱荷华州可获得的首选避孕策略:政策和医疗保健环境变化影响的纵向定性研究。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(3):1494-1518. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0126.
8
A Prospective Cohort Study of Changes in Access to Contraceptive Care and Use Two Years after Iowa Medicaid Coverage Restrictions at Abortion-Providing Facilities Went into Effect.一项前瞻性队列研究:爱荷华州堕胎提供机构医疗补助覆盖限制生效两年后避孕护理可及性与使用情况的变化
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022;41(6):2555-2583. doi: 10.1007/s11113-022-09740-4. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
9
Women's experiences with person-centered family planning care: Differences by sociodemographic characteristics.女性以人为主导的计划生育护理体验:社会人口学特征差异
Contracept X. 2022 Jul 25;4:100081. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100081. eCollection 2022.
10
US Sexual and Reproductive Health Policy: Which Frameworks Are Needed Now, and Next Steps Forward.美国性与生殖健康政策:当前需要哪些框架以及后续前进步骤。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jun;112(S5):S518-S522. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306929.

不同种族和民族认同的计划生育患者中,避孕护理体验与后续避孕方法获取和偏好之间的差异关联:来自亚利桑那州、爱荷华州和威斯康星州的证据。

Differential associations between experiences of contraceptive care and subsequent contraceptive access and preferences among family planning patients by racial and ethnic identity: Evidence from Arizona, Iowa, and Wisconsin.

机构信息

Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 11;19(10):e0312111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312111. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0312111
PMID:39392846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11469507/
Abstract

While many frameworks exist for building person-centered and equitable systems of contraceptive care, evidence indicates that the reality of patients' experiences of care is often not in alignment with these ideals. Historical and current contexts of racism in the healthcare system contribute to negative perceptions and experiences of care, as well as reduced care-seeking behavior, for those who identify as Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC). Our objective in this analysis is to examine whether people's past experiences of contraceptive care are a driver of subsequent barriers to contraceptive access, and whether this relationship differs across racial and ethnic identity. We draw on panel data from five waves of surveys collected between 2018-2023 among patients ages fifteen and older seeking family planning care at sites that receive public funding for these services in Arizona, Iowa, and Wisconsin. Overall and stratified by race/ethnicity, we examine cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between patients' experiences of high-quality, person-centered contraceptive care and three contraceptive access outcomes: use of preferred contraception, satisfaction with contraceptive method, and experience of no barriers to accessing preferred contraception. We find longitudinal associations between patients experiencing higher-quality, more person-centered contraceptive care and subsequent satisfaction with contraceptive methods. Among non-Hispanic white-identifying patients, we find similar associations between shifting to higher-quality contraceptive care and use of preferred contraception, but we find no statistical relationship between experiencing higher-quality care and subsequent contraceptive outcomes for patients who identify as Black, Indigenous, or Person of Color (BIPOC). Highlighting the dissonance between clinical guidance for quality contraceptive care and patient experiences of care, and especially whether similar experiences across racial and ethnic identity lead to differential outcomes, is a crucial step toward bringing contraceptive care systems into alignment with principles of sexual and reproductive health equity.

摘要

虽然有许多框架可用于构建以人为本和公平的避孕护理系统,但有证据表明,患者的护理体验现实往往与这些理想不符。医疗保健系统中存在的历史和当前种族主义情况导致那些自认为是黑人、原住民和有色人种(BIPOC)的人对护理的看法和体验负面,以及寻求护理的行为减少。我们在这项分析中的目的是检验人们过去的避孕护理经历是否是随后获得避孕机会的障碍的驱动因素,以及这种关系是否因种族和族裔身份而异。我们借鉴了 2018 年至 2023 年期间在亚利桑那州、爱荷华州和威斯康星州接受公共资金提供这些服务的地点寻求计划生育护理的 15 岁及以上患者的五次调查的面板数据。我们总体上并按种族/族裔进行分层,研究了患者对高质量、以人为本的避孕护理的体验与三种避孕机会获取结果之间的横断面和纵向关联:首选避孕方法的使用、对避孕方法的满意度以及获取首选避孕方法无障碍的体验。我们发现,患者经历更高质量、更以人为本的避孕护理与随后对避孕方法的满意度之间存在纵向关联。在非西班牙裔白人患者中,我们发现从较低质量的避孕护理转变为更高质量的避孕护理与首选避孕方法的使用之间存在类似的关联,但我们发现,对于自认为是黑人、原住民或有色人种(BIPOC)的患者,经历更高质量的护理与随后的避孕结果之间没有统计学关系。强调临床指导的高质量避孕护理与患者护理体验之间的不和谐,尤其是不同种族和族裔身份的患者是否有类似的体验导致不同的结果,是使避孕护理系统与性健康和生殖健康公平原则保持一致的关键步骤。