Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; Department of Health, Long-term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany; High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Department of Health, Long-term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany; High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
J Dent. 2021 Apr;107:103607. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103607. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
To describe and compare the objective and subjective oral health of older nursing home residents and home care recipients, and to investigate whether oral health is associated with sociodemographic characteristics and the long-term care (LTC) setting.
In two German studies, the oral health of 246 nursing home residents and 90 home care recipients aged ≥60 years was assessed objectively using the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) and subjectively using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). OHAT and OHIP scores were compared between both settings. Multivariable logistic regressions were applied to investigate whether oral health is associated with sex, age group, LTC grade, and LTC setting.
OHAT and OHIP mean scores in the home care setting were higher compared to the nursing home setting (OHAT: 3.13 vs. 1.28, p < .0001; OHIP: 7.81 vs. 2.15, p < .0001). The adjusted odds ratios for poor objective and subjective oral health for home care recipients vs. nursing home residents were 6.71 (95 % confidence interval 3.29-13.69) and 4.92 (2.77-8.76). No significant associations with sociodemographic characteristics were found.
Oral health was poor in both settings, but home care recipients were more likely to have poor oral health than nursing home residents. Interventions to improve oral health are needed in the nursing home setting and, even more importantly, in the home care setting.
Oral health among older people in need of LTC is poor and should be improved. From a health policy perspective, home care recipients may need more attention.
描述和比较老年养老院居民和家庭护理接受者的客观和主观口腔健康,并探讨口腔健康是否与社会人口统计学特征和长期护理(LTC)环境相关。
在两项德国研究中,使用口腔健康评估工具(OHAT)客观评估了 246 名养老院居民和 90 名年龄≥60 岁的家庭护理接受者的口腔健康,并使用口腔健康影响简表(OHIP)进行主观评估。比较了两种环境中的 OHAT 和 OHIP 评分。应用多变量逻辑回归来调查口腔健康是否与性别、年龄组、LTC 等级和 LTC 环境相关。
家庭护理环境中的 OHAT 和 OHIP 平均得分高于养老院环境(OHAT:3.13 对 1.28,p <.0001;OHIP:7.81 对 2.15,p <.0001)。与养老院居民相比,家庭护理接受者的客观和主观口腔健康较差的调整后比值比分别为 6.71(95 %置信区间 3.29-13.69)和 4.92(2.77-8.76)。与社会人口统计学特征无显著相关性。
两种环境中的口腔健康均较差,但家庭护理接受者的口腔健康较差的可能性高于养老院居民。需要在养老院环境中进行改善口腔健康的干预措施,而在家庭护理环境中更需要进行干预。
需要长期护理的老年人的口腔健康状况较差,需要改善。从卫生政策的角度来看,家庭护理接受者可能需要更多关注。