Suppr超能文献

确定成人脊柱畸形患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)的效度、区分能力、反应度及最小临床重要差异。

Determining validity, discriminant ability, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important differences for PROMIS in adult spinal deformity.

作者信息

Ibaseta Alvaro, Rahman Rafa, Andrade Nicholas S, Skolasky Richard L, Kebaish Khaled M, Sciubba Daniel M, Neuman Brian J

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Feb 19;34(5):725-733. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.SPINE191551. Print 2021 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the concurrent validity, discriminant ability, and responsiveness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) and to calculate minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for PROMIS scores.

METHODS

The authors used data obtained in 186 surgical patients with ASD. Concurrent validity was determined through correlations between preoperative PROMIS scores and legacy measure scores. PROMIS discriminant ability between disease severity groups was determined using the preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) value as the anchor. Responsiveness was determined through distribution- and anchor-based methods, using preoperative to postoperative changes in PROMIS scores. MCIDs were estimated on the basis of the responsiveness analysis.

RESULTS

The authors found strong correlations between PROMIS Pain Interference and ODI and the Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire Pain component; PROMIS Physical Function and ODI; PROMIS Anxiety and Depression domains and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2, Physical and Mental Components, Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire Mental Health component (anxiety only), 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (anxiety only), and 7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire; PROMIS Fatigue and 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire; and PROMIS Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles (i.e., Social Satisfaction) and ODI. PROMIS discriminated between disease severity groups in all domains except between none/mild and moderate Anxiety, with mean differences ranging from 3.7 to 8.4 points. PROMIS showed strong responsiveness in Pain Interference; moderate responsiveness in Physical Function and Social Satisfaction; and low responsiveness in Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, and Sleep Disturbance. Final PROMIS MCIDs were as follows: -6.3 for Anxiety, -4.4 for Depression, -4.6 for Fatigue, -5.0 for Pain Interference, 4.2 for Physical Function, 5.7 for Social Satisfaction, and -3.5 for Sleep Disturbance.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMIS is a valid assessment of patient health, can discriminate between disease severity levels, and shows responsiveness to changes after ASD surgery. The MCIDs provided herein may help clinicians interpret postoperative changes in PROMIS scores, taking into account the fact that they are pending external validation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)在成人脊柱畸形(ASD)中的同时效度、区分能力和反应度,并计算PROMIS评分的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。

方法

作者使用了186例接受手术治疗的ASD患者的数据。通过术前PROMIS评分与传统测量评分之间的相关性来确定同时效度。以术前Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)值作为锚定指标,确定PROMIS在疾病严重程度组之间的区分能力。通过基于分布和锚定的方法,利用术前至术后PROMIS评分的变化来确定反应度。基于反应度分析估计MCID。

结果

作者发现PROMIS疼痛干扰与ODI以及脊柱侧弯研究学会22项问卷疼痛分量表之间有很强的相关性;PROMIS身体功能与ODI之间有很强的相关性;PROMIS焦虑和抑郁领域与简明健康调查简表2版身体和精神分量表、脊柱侧弯研究学会22项问卷心理健康分量表(仅焦虑)、9项患者健康问卷(仅焦虑)和7项广泛性焦虑障碍问卷之间有很强的相关性;PROMIS疲劳与9项患者健康问卷之间有很强的相关性;PROMIS对参与社会角色的满意度(即社会满意度)与ODI之间有很强的相关性。除了无/轻度与中度焦虑之间外,PROMIS在所有领域都能区分疾病严重程度组,平均差异为3.7至8.4分。PROMIS在疼痛干扰方面显示出较强的反应度;在身体功能和社会满意度方面显示出中度反应度;在焦虑、抑郁、疲劳和睡眠障碍方面显示出较低的反应度。最终的PROMIS MCID如下:焦虑为-6.3,抑郁为-4.4,疲劳为-4.6,疼痛干扰为-5.0,身体功能为4.2,社会满意度为5.7,睡眠障碍为-3.5。

结论

PROMIS是对患者健康状况的有效评估,能够区分疾病严重程度水平,并显示出对ASD手术后变化的反应度。本文提供的MCID可能有助于临床医生解释PROMIS评分的术后变化,同时要考虑到这些结果尚待外部验证。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验