Sah Orthopaedic Associates, Institute for Joint Restoration, Center for Joint Replacement Bldg, Fremont, California.
J Knee Surg. 2022 Oct;35(12):1378-1384. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1723972. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
Maximizing hemostasis during total knee replacement procedures remains a key challenge in current practice. Bipolar sealer technology achieves intraoperative hemostasis through tissue sealing and coagulation with adjustable radio frequency energy and a saline-irrigated tip. Optimal surgical site hemostasis is important to avoid potential complications such as hemarthrosis, wound drainage, increased pain, delayed discharge, and readmissions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the bipolar sealer device in primary knee replacement in the largest consecutive series to date. A consecutive, treatment-control series of subjects who underwent a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) utilizing a bipolar sealer for hemostasis, one subgroup with concomitant tranexamic acid (TXA) administration ( = 1599) and one subgroup without TXA administration ( = 3582), compared with a control group of primary TKA under tourniquet only ( = 667). Statistical analyses were performed through two-tailed unpaired -tests. There was less total postoperative drain output and a lower overall transfusion rate in the bipolar sealer group (807ml ± 428) (2.5%) than the tourniquet only group (1290 ± 658, = 0.001) (8.4%, = 0.0001), respectively. Drainage output in bipolar sealer + TXA (450 ± 297 ml) was lower than the other two groups (bipolar sealer 807 ± 428 mL, = 0.0001; tourniquet only 1290 ± 658 ml, = 0.0001). The bipolar sealer group had a higher hematocrit at postoperative day 1 (POD1) (bipolar sealer: 33.1 ± 4.3 cc, tourniquet only: 32.5 ± 4.3 cc, = 0.001) and at discharge (POD2, bipolar sealer: 31.5 ± 3.7 cc, tourniquet only: 30.2 ± 3.9 cc, = 0.0001). There were zero reported serious adverse events related to hemostasis management in any group. The bipolar sealer system is a safe and effective instrument to achieve intraoperative hemostasis during primary TKA. The bipolar sealer group required significantly fewer postoperative blood product transfusions and maintained a higher hematocrit concentration at the time of discharge compared with subjects treated solely with tourniquet mediated hemostasis. Addition of TXA to local hemostasis methods may further reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This is a Level III study.
在全膝关节置换手术中,最大限度地实现止血仍然是当前实践中的一个关键挑战。双极密封技术通过可调节射频能量和盐水冲洗尖端实现组织密封和凝血,从而实现术中止血。最佳的手术部位止血对于避免潜在的并发症很重要,如关节积血、伤口引流、疼痛增加、延迟出院和再次入院。本研究旨在评估双极密封器在迄今为止最大的连续系列原发性膝关节置换中的安全性和有效性。连续的、治疗对照系列的受试者接受了双极密封器进行止血的初次全膝关节置换术(TKA),其中一个亚组同时使用氨甲环酸(TXA)( = 1599),另一个亚组未使用 TXA( = 3582),与仅使用止血带的初次 TKA 对照组( = 667)进行比较。通过双侧未配对 -检验进行统计分析。与仅使用止血带组(1290 ± 658 毫升, = 0.001)(8.4%, = 0.0001)相比,双极密封组的总术后引流量更少(807ml ± 428)(2.5%)。双极密封器 + TXA(450 ± 297 ml)的引流量低于其他两组(双极密封器 807 ± 428 ml, = 0.0001;止血带仅 1290 ± 658 ml, = 0.0001)。与仅使用止血带组相比,双极密封组在术后第 1 天(POD1)(双极密封器:33.1 ± 4.3 cc,止血带仅:32.5 ± 4.3 cc, = 0.001)和出院时(POD2,双极密封器:31.5 ± 3.7 cc,止血带仅:30.2 ± 3.9 cc, = 0.0001)的血细胞比容更高。在任何一组中都没有报告与止血管理相关的严重不良事件。双极密封系统是一种安全有效的仪器,可在初次 TKA 期间实现术中止血。与仅使用止血带介导止血的患者相比,双极密封组术后需要的血液制品输注明显减少,并且在出院时的血细胞比容浓度更高。局部止血方法中添加 TXA 可能会进一步减少失血和输血需求。证据水平:这是一项 III 级研究。