Suppr超能文献

丹麦一项全国性研究,探讨与 I 型和 II 型子宫内膜癌相关的危险因素。

A Danish nationwide study of risk factors associated with Type I and Type II endometrial cancer.

机构信息

Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Statistics and Data Analysis, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2021 May;161(2):553-558. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine risk factors for Type I and Type II endometrial cancer (EC) and to directly compare the influence of risk factors for Type II with Type I tumors. Furthermore, to examine whether risk factors for high-grade Type I and Type II tumors differed from low-grade Type I tumors.

METHODS

Women with EC diagnosed during 2000-2016 were identified in the Danish Cancer Registry. A case-control analysis was conducted with 1:15 random population controls matched on age and gender. Using conditional logistic regression, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals on risk factors for Type I and II tumors were estimated. In case-case analyses, risk factors were evaluated in a direct comparison of cases grouped by tumor type and grade.

RESULTS

We identified 6958 women with Type I EC and 1206 women with Type II EC. In the case-control analysis, nulliparity and diabetes were associated with increased risk of both tumor types, whereas hormone replacement therapy only increased the risk of Type I EC. When directly comparing Type I and II tumors, the influence of BMI ≥ 30, current smoking, and parity ≥ 3 was strongest for Type I EC. The associations for the majority of risk factors were similar for Type II and high-grade Type I tumors compared with low-grade Type II tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for Type I and II tumors were overlapping suggesting that Type II tumors may be less estrogen-independent than previously anticipated. High-grade Type I tumors seemed to resemble Type II tumors more than low-grade Type I tumors.

摘要

目的

探讨Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型子宫内膜癌(EC)的危险因素,并直接比较Ⅱ型肿瘤危险因素的影响。此外,还研究了高级别Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型肿瘤的危险因素是否与低级别Ⅰ型肿瘤的危险因素不同。

方法

在丹麦癌症登记处确定了 2000 年至 2016 年间诊断为 EC 的女性。采用病例对照分析,按年龄和性别 1:15 随机匹配人群对照。采用条件逻辑回归,估计Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型肿瘤危险因素的比值比和 95%置信区间。在病例对照分析中,通过按肿瘤类型和分级分组的病例直接比较来评估危险因素。

结果

我们确定了 6958 名Ⅰ型 EC 女性和 1206 名Ⅱ型 EC 女性。在病例对照分析中,未婚和糖尿病与两种肿瘤类型的风险增加相关,而激素替代疗法仅增加了Ⅰ型 EC 的风险。当直接比较Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型肿瘤时,对于Ⅰ型 EC,BMI≥30、当前吸烟和产次≥3 的影响最大。与低级别Ⅱ型肿瘤相比,大多数危险因素与Ⅱ型和高级别Ⅰ型肿瘤的关联相似。

结论

Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型肿瘤的危险因素重叠,表明Ⅱ型肿瘤可能不像以前预期的那样与雌激素无关。高级别Ⅰ型肿瘤似乎比低级别Ⅰ型肿瘤更类似于Ⅱ型肿瘤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验