Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 23;118(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2019055118.
We demonstrate that the Langmuir-Hinshelwood formalism is an incomplete kinetic description and, in particular, that the Hinshelwood assumption (i.e., that adsorbates are randomly distributed on the surface) is inappropriate even in catalytic reactions as simple as A + A → A The Hinshelwood assumption results in miscounting of site pairs (e.g., A*-A*) and, consequently, in erroneous rates, reaction orders, and identification of rate-determining steps. The clustering and isolation of surface species unnoticed by the Langmuir-Hinshelwood model is rigorously accounted for by derivation of higher-order rate terms containing statistical factors specific to each site ensemble. Ensemble-specific statistical rate terms arise irrespective of and couple with lateral adsorbate interactions, are distinct for each elementary step including surface diffusion events (e.g., A* + * → * + A*), and provide physical insight obscured by the nonanalytical nature of the kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) method-with which the higher-order formalism quantitatively agrees. The limitations of the Langmuir-Hinshelwood model are attributed to the incorrect assertion that the rate of an elementary step is the same with respect to each site ensemble. In actuality, each elementary step-including adsorbate diffusion-traverses through each ensemble with unique rate, reversibility, and kinetic-relevance to the overall reaction rate. Explicit kinetic description of ensemble-specific paths is key to the improvements of the higher-order formalism; enables quantification of ensemble-specific rate, reversibility, and degree of rate control of surface diffusion; and reveals that a single elementary step can, counter intuitively, be both equilibrated and rate determining.
我们证明 Langmuir-Hinshelwood 形式主义是一个不完全的动力学描述,特别是 Hinshelwood 假设(即吸附物在表面上随机分布)即使在像 A + A → A 这样简单的催化反应中也是不恰当的。Hinshelwood 假设导致了对位点对(例如 A*-A*)的计数错误,因此导致了错误的速率、反应级数和速率决定步骤的识别。Langmuir-Hinshelwood 模型未注意到的表面物种的聚类和隔离通过包含特定于每个位点集合的统计因子的高阶速率项的推导得到了严格的说明。与横向吸附物相互作用无关且与之耦合的集合特异性统计速率项,对于包括表面扩散事件(例如 A* + * → * + A*)在内的每个基本步骤都是独特的,并且提供了由动力学蒙特卡罗(kMC)方法的非分析性质掩盖的物理洞察力-该方法与高阶形式主义定量一致。Langmuir-Hinshelwood 模型的局限性归因于不正确的断言,即基本步骤的速率相对于每个位点集合是相同的。实际上,每个基本步骤-包括吸附物扩散-以独特的速率、可逆性和与总反应速率的动力学相关性穿过每个集合。对集合特异性路径的显式动力学描述是改进高阶形式主义的关键;能够量化集合特异性速率、可逆性和表面扩散的速率控制程度;并揭示出单个基本步骤可以反直觉地既是平衡的又是速率决定的。