不同定义“点征”的标准在预测脑出血血肿扩大和临床结局方面的能力不同:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Different criteria for defining "spot sign" in intracerebral hemorrhage show different abilities to predict hematoma expansion and clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
机构信息
Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, No. 295 Xi Chang Lu, Kunming, 650032, Yunnan Province, People's Republic of China.
出版信息
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Dec;44(6):3059-3068. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01503-7. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
The "spot sign" is a well-known radiological marker used for predicting hematoma expansion and clinical outcomes in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We performed a meta-analysis to assess the predictive accuracy of spot sign, depending on the criteria used to identify them.We conducted a systematic review of clinical studies that clearly stated their definition of spot sign and that were indexed in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. We collected data on computed tomography (CT) parameters, spot sign diagnostic criteria, hematoma expansion, and clinical outcomes.Based on the eligibility criteria, we included 17 studies in this systematic review. CT imaging modality, type, time from symptom onset to CT, time from contrast infusion to scan, slice thickness, tube current, and tube electric discharge showed variation across studies. Three different definitions of the spot sign were applied: (1) a hyperdense spot within the hematoma; (2) one or more focal areas/regions of contrast pooling of any size and morphology that occurred within a hemorrhage, were discontinuous from the normal or abnormal vasculature adjacent to the hemorrhage, and showed an attenuation rate ≥ 120 UH; or (3) serpiginous or spot-like contrast density on CTA images that occurred within the hematoma margin, showed twice the density of the hematoma background, and did not contact vessels outside the hematoma. Three definitions for the spot sign were identified, all of which were associated with hematoma expansion, mortality, and unfavorable functional outcome. Subgroup analyses based on these definitions showed that spot sign identified using the second definition were more likely to be associated with hematoma expansion (OR 18.31, 95% CI 9.11-36.8) and unfavorable functional outcomes (OR 8.78, 95% CI 3.24-23.79), while those identified using the third definition were associated with increased risk of mortality (OR 6.88, 95% CI 1.43-33.13).Clinical studies identify spot sign using different CT protocols and criteria. These differences affect the ability of spot sign to predict hematoma expansion and clinical outcomes in ICH patients.
“点征”是一种众所周知的影像学标志物,用于预测脑出血(ICH)患者的血肿扩大和临床结局。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估根据不同的识别标准得出的点征预测准确性。
我们对明确陈述点征定义并在 Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE 和中国国家知识基础设施数据库中收录的临床研究进行了系统评价。我们收集了 CT 参数、点征诊断标准、血肿扩大和临床结局的数据。
根据入选标准,我们对 17 项系统评价研究进行了荟萃分析。CT 成像方式、类型、从症状发作到 CT 的时间、从造影剂注射到扫描的时间、层厚、管电流和管放电在研究之间存在差异。点征有三种不同的定义:(1)血肿内的高密度点;(2)一个或多个大小和形态的局灶性/区域性对比聚集,位于血肿内,与血肿周围的正常或异常血管不连续,且衰减率≥120 UH;或(3)在血肿边缘出现的螺旋状或点状对比密度,其密度是血肿背景的两倍,且不与血肿外的血管接触。我们确定了三种点征定义,所有这些定义都与血肿扩大、死亡率和不良功能结局相关。基于这些定义的亚组分析表明,使用第二个定义识别的点征更有可能与血肿扩大(OR 18.31,95%CI 9.11-36.8)和不良功能结局(OR 8.78,95%CI 3.24-23.79)相关,而使用第三个定义识别的点征与死亡率升高相关(OR 6.88,95%CI 1.43-33.13)。
临床研究使用不同的 CT 协议和标准识别点征。这些差异影响了点征预测 ICH 患者血肿扩大和临床结局的能力。