Department of Neurology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
The University of Sydney, The Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Neurol. 2021 Aug;268(8):2876-2889. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10451-7. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
To comprehensively examine the clinical presentation of patients diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia-motor neuron disease (FTD-MND) compared to FTD subtypes. To clarify the heterogeneity of behavioural and language deficits in FTD-MND using a data-driven approach.
Patients with FTD-MND (n = 31), behavioural variant FTD (n = 119), non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia (n = 47), semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (n = 42), and controls (n = 127) underwent comprehensive clinical, cognitive and behavioural assessments. Two-step cluster analysis examined patterns of behavioural and language impairment. Voxel-based morphometry and tract-based spatial statistics were used to investigate differences across the subgroups that emerged from cluster analysis.
More than half of FTD-MND patients initially presented with variable combinations of deficits (e.g., mixed behaviour/cognitive, mixed behaviour/cognitive/motor deficits), with 74% of them meeting criteria for FTD-MND within 24 months with a median of 12 months. The frequency and severity of behavioural and language abnormalities in FTD-MND lie between that seen in the three FTD phenotypes. Cluster analysis identified three patterns of behavioural and language impairment in FTD-MND. The three FTD-MND subgroups demonstrated different profiles of white matter tract disruption, but did not differ in age at onset, disease duration or patterns of cortical atrophy.
While highly heterogeneous, in terms of behavioural and language deficits, and disease severity, the presentation of FTD-MND may be distinct to that of FTD. Distinct white matter degeneration patterns may underpin heterogeneous clinical profiles in FTD-MND. FTD presenting with mixed behavioural-language disturbances should be monitored closely for at least 12-24 months for the emergence of MND symptoms/signs.
全面研究与额颞叶痴呆-运动神经元病(FTD-MND)相比,FTD 各亚型患者的临床表现。采用数据驱动的方法阐明 FTD-MND 患者行为和语言缺陷的异质性。
FTD-MND 患者(n=31)、行为变异型额颞叶痴呆(n=119)、非流利型原发性进行性失语症(n=47)、语义变异型原发性进行性失语症(n=42)和对照组(n=127)接受了全面的临床、认知和行为评估。两步聚类分析检查了行为和语言损伤的模式。基于体素的形态测量学和基于束流的空间统计学用于研究聚类分析中出现的亚组之间的差异。
超过一半的 FTD-MND 患者最初表现出不同组合的缺陷(例如,混合行为/认知、混合行为/认知/运动缺陷),其中 74%的患者在 24 个月内符合 FTD-MND 的标准,中位数为 12 个月。FTD-MND 患者的行为和语言异常的频率和严重程度介于三种 FTD 表型之间。聚类分析确定了 FTD-MND 中三种行为和语言损伤模式。三个 FTD-MND 亚组表现出不同的白质束破坏模式,但在发病年龄、疾病持续时间或皮质萎缩模式方面没有差异。
虽然在行为和语言缺陷以及疾病严重程度方面高度异质,但 FTD-MND 的表现可能与 FTD 不同。不同的白质退化模式可能为 FTD-MND 中的异质临床特征提供基础。表现出混合行为-语言障碍的 FTD 至少应密切监测 12-24 个月,以观察 MND 症状/体征的出现。