Sterling S, Edelmann R J
Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, U.K.
J Clin Psychol. 1988 Mar;44(2):96-100. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198803)44:2<96::aid-jclp2270440202>3.0.co;2-a.
A psychopathic offender group (N = 17) and a nonpsychopathic, non-offender control group (N = 15) were presented with descriptions of anxiety and anger-provoking situations (derived from a pilot study) together with a series of questions designed to evaluate their cognitive appraisal and anticipated reactions of self and other to the situation. The psychopathic group rated the anxiety situations as more anxiety-, fear-, and threat-inducing than did the control group, while the reverse was true for the anger situations. Both sets of scenarios were seen as more anger-inducing by the psychopathic group. There was little difference between the groups in anticipated reactions of self and others. Implications of the results for cognitive interventions aimed at anger management are discussed.
向一组精神病态罪犯(N = 17)和一组非精神病态、非罪犯的对照组(N = 15)呈现焦虑和愤怒诱发情境的描述(源自一项初步研究),以及一系列旨在评估他们对情境的认知评估和对自我及他人预期反应的问题。与对照组相比,精神病态组对焦虑情境的焦虑、恐惧和威胁诱导程度的评分更高,而在愤怒情境方面则相反。两组情境在精神病态组看来都更易诱发愤怒。两组在自我和他人的预期反应方面差异不大。讨论了研究结果对旨在控制愤怒的认知干预的启示。