Flurin Laure, Greenwood-Quaintance Kerryl E, Esper Ronda N, Sanchez-Sotelo Joaquin, Patel Robin
Divisions of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Aug;30(8):1741-1749. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.01.023. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a relatively frequent and oftentimes devastating complication after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Its microbiologic diagnosis is usually based on periprosthetic tissue culture (hereafter referred to as tissue culture), but the sensitivity of tissue culture is variable. Although implant sonication culture has been shown to be superior to tissue culture for the diagnosis of hip and knee PJI, only a single small study (of fewer than 10 infected implants) has assessed sonication for PJI diagnosis after elbow arthroplasty.
We retrospectively analyzed 112 sonicate fluid cultures from patients who underwent revision of a TEA at a single institution between 2007 and 2019, comparing results to those of tissue cultures. We excluded patients who had fewer than 2 tissues submitted for culture. Using the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines to define PJI, there were 49 infected and 63 non-infected cases. Median ages in the PJI and non-infected groups were 66 and 61 years, respectively. In the non-infected group, 65% were female vs. 63% in the PJI group. We reviewed clinical characteristics and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of tissue compared with sonicate fluid culture. In addition, we compared the sensitivity of tissue culture to the combination of tissue and sonicate fluid culture.
The most common pathogens were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus sp (49%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (12%). Sensitivity of tissue culture was 63%, and sensitivity of sonicate fluid culture was 76% (P = .109). Specificity of tissue culture was 94% and specificity of sonicate fluid culture was 100%. Sensitivity of sonicate fluid culture in combination with tissue culture was 84% (P = .002 compared to tissue culture alone).
In this study, we found that the combination of sonicate fluid and tissue culture had a greater sensitivity than tissue culture alone for microbiologic diagnosis of PJI after TEA.
人工关节周围感染(PJI)是全肘关节置换术(TEA)后相对常见且往往具有破坏性的并发症。其微生物学诊断通常基于人工关节周围组织培养(以下简称组织培养),但组织培养的敏感性存在差异。尽管植入物超声处理培养已被证明在诊断髋关节和膝关节PJI方面优于组织培养,但仅有一项小型研究(少于10个感染植入物)评估了超声处理在肘关节置换术后PJI诊断中的应用。
我们回顾性分析了2007年至2019年间在单一机构接受TEA翻修手术患者的112份超声处理液培养结果,并与组织培养结果进行比较。我们排除了送检组织少于2份用于培养的患者。根据美国传染病学会的指南来定义PJI,其中有49例感染病例和63例未感染病例。PJI组和未感染组的中位年龄分别为66岁和61岁。在未感染组中,65%为女性,而PJI组为63%。我们回顾了临床特征,并计算了组织培养与超声处理液培养相比的敏感性和特异性。此外,我们还比较了组织培养与组织培养和超声处理液培养联合检测的敏感性。
最常见的病原体是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(49%),其次是金黄色葡萄球菌(12%)。组织培养的敏感性为63%,超声处理液培养的敏感性为76%(P = 0.109)。组织培养的特异性为94%,超声处理液培养的特异性为100%。超声处理液培养与组织培养联合检测的敏感性为84%(与单独组织培养相比,P = 0.002)。
在本研究中,我们发现超声处理液和组织培养联合检测在TEA后PJI的微生物学诊断中比单独组织培养具有更高的敏感性。