Suppr超能文献

术前对比增强超声(CEUS)对长骨骨不连的微生物学具有可靠的预测价值,但对种植体超声的预测价值则不然。

Preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of long bone nonunions reliably predicts microbiology of tissue culture samples but not of implant-sonication.

机构信息

Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany; Ultrasound Center, Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Heidelberg, Germany.

Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Sep;108(5):102862. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102862. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Bacterial infection in the context of fracture repair remains a severe complication in trauma surgery and may result in long bone nonunion. Since treatment options for aseptic and infected nonunions vary greatly, diagnostic methods should ideally differentiate between these two entities as accurately as possible. Recently, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been introduced as a preoperative imaging technique to evaluate hypervascularity at the fracture site as sign of bacterial infection.

HYPOTHESIS

Preoperative CEUS predicts results of microbiological evaluation obtained either by culture of tissue samples or by analyzing the sonication fluid following removal and sonication of the implant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over the course of 6 months, 26 patients with long bone nonunions were included in this study. Patients' clinical data were evaluated. Tissue samples were collected intraoperatively and examined by standard microbiological techniques. The sonication method was applied to removed implants. Additionally, 1-3 days before surgery, CEUS was performed to determine hypervascularity at the nonunion site as a possible parameter for infection.

RESULTS

Culture of tissue samples indicated infection in 50% of cases and implant sonication in 57.7% of cases. However, there was merely a fair agreement (κ=0.231) between these two diagnostic methods. CEUS predicted results of tissue culture reliably (sensitivity 92.3% and specificity 100%), whereas implant sonication showed no significant correlations with results from CEUS. Hypertrophic and atrophic nonunions were evaluated separately to determine possible differences in vascularity. We found that contrast peak enhancement of CEUS was similar in atrophic and hypertrophic nonunions with positive culture of tissue samples. Both differed significantly from culture negative cases (p=0.0016 and 0.0062). Results of implant-sonication positive or negative cases in atrophic and hypertrophic nonunions, however, were less clear and could be misleading.

DISCUSSION

We were able to confirm CEUS as a valuable preoperative diagnostic tool that reliably predicts microbiology of tissue culture samples, but not of implant sonication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I; diagnostic study.

摘要

简介

在骨折修复的背景下,细菌感染仍然是创伤外科的严重并发症,可能导致长骨骨不连。由于无菌性和感染性骨不连的治疗选择有很大差异,因此诊断方法应尽可能准确地区分这两种情况。最近,对比增强超声(CEUS)已被引入术前成像技术,以评估骨折部位的高血管性,作为细菌感染的标志。

假设

术前 CEUS 可预测通过组织样本培养或通过分析去除和超声处理植入物后的超声液来获得的微生物学评估结果。

患者和方法

在 6 个月的时间里,这项研究纳入了 26 例长骨骨不连患者。评估了患者的临床数据。术中采集组织样本,并通过标准微生物技术进行检查。应用超声法处理去除的植入物。此外,在手术前 1-3 天,进行 CEUS 以确定非愈合部位的高血管性,作为感染的可能参数。

结果

组织样本培养显示 50%的病例存在感染,植入物超声显示 57.7%的病例存在感染。然而,这两种诊断方法之间仅有适度的一致性(κ=0.231)。CEUS 可可靠地预测组织培养结果(灵敏度 92.3%,特异性 100%),而植入物超声与 CEUS 结果无显著相关性。分别评估肥大性和萎缩性骨不连,以确定血管化的可能差异。我们发现,CEUS 的对比峰值增强在组织样本培养阳性的萎缩性和肥大性骨不连中相似。两者与培养阴性病例相比差异均有统计学意义(p=0.0016 和 0.0062)。然而,在萎缩性和肥大性骨不连中,植入物超声阳性或阴性病例的结果则不太清楚,可能具有误导性。

讨论

我们能够证实 CEUS 是一种有价值的术前诊断工具,可可靠地预测组织培养样本的微生物学,但不能预测植入物超声的结果。

证据水平

I;诊断研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验