Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, 21231, USA.
J Neurooncol. 2021 Feb;151(3):375-391. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03481-0. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
Despite recent advances in treatment for a number of cancers with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), immunotherapy has had limited efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM). The recent multi-centered CheckMate 143 trial in first time recurrent GBM and the Checkmate 498 trial in newly diagnosed unmethylated GBM showed that antibodies against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) failed to improve overall survival in patients with GBM. Recent preclinical and clinical studies have explored combining ICB with several other therapies including additional ICB against alternative checkpoint molecules, activation of costimulatory checkpoint molecules such as 4-1BB, radiation-induced tumor cell lysis and immunogenic recruitment, local chemotherapy, neoadjuvant ICB therapy, and myeloid cell reactivation.
We have reviewed the literature on ICB seminal to the progression of several preclinical studies and clinical trials in order to provide a compendium of the current state of combination immunotherapy for GBM. For ongoing clinical trials without associated publications, we searched clinicaltrials.gov for ongoing studies using the keywords, "GBM" and "glioblastoma", as well as names of checkpoint molecules.
Recent trends from clinical trials demonstrate that despite a variety of different combination strategies involving ICB, GBM remains largely elusive to current immunotherapies. There is a discordance of survival outcomes between GBM pre-clinical models and clinical trials, likely due to the heterogeneity of GBM in patients as well as other adaptive immune mechanisms not otherwise represented in murine models. However, in clinical studies, neoadjuvant ICB in GBM was found to diversify the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire and increase chemokine mRNA transcripts when comparing pre- and post- surgical time points. Moreover, an increase in peripheral and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) clonotypes were also observed when comparing adjuvant and neoadjuvant cohorts.
Despite the lack of clinical survival benefit, immune modulation was observed in multiple different combination strategies for GBM in both preclinical and clinical studies, indicating that ICB combination therapy results in a significant immunological impact on the tumor microenvironment.
尽管近年来免疫检查点阻断(ICB)在治疗多种癌症方面取得了进展,但免疫疗法在胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)中的疗效有限。最近在首次复发性 GBM 中进行的多中心 CheckMate 143 试验和新诊断的未甲基化 GBM 中进行的 CheckMate 498 试验表明,针对程序性细胞死亡蛋白 1(PD-1)的抗体未能改善 GBM 患者的总生存期。最近的临床前和临床研究探索了将 ICB 与其他几种疗法结合使用,包括针对替代检查点分子的额外 ICB、激活共刺激检查点分子(如 4-1BB)、辐射诱导的肿瘤细胞裂解和免疫募集、局部化疗、新辅助 ICB 治疗和髓样细胞再激活。
我们回顾了 ICB 的文献,这些文献对几项临床前研究和临床试验的进展至关重要,以便为 GBM 的联合免疫治疗现状提供一个纲要。对于没有相关出版物的正在进行的临床试验,我们使用关键词“GBM”和“glioblastoma”以及检查点分子的名称在 clinicaltrials.gov 上搜索正在进行的研究。
临床试验的最新趋势表明,尽管涉及 ICB 的各种不同组合策略,但 GBM 仍然对当前的免疫疗法难以捉摸。GBM 的临床前模型和临床试验的生存结果之间存在不一致性,这可能是由于患者的 GBM 异质性以及其他在鼠模型中未得到体现的适应性免疫机制所致。然而,在临床研究中,在比较术前和术后时间点时,GBM 中的新辅助 ICB 发现可使 T 细胞受体(TCR)谱多样化,并增加趋化因子 mRNA 转录物。此外,当比较辅助和新辅助队列时,还观察到外周血和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL)克隆型的增加。
尽管缺乏临床生存获益,但在临床前和临床研究中,针对 GBM 的多种不同组合策略都观察到了免疫调节,表明 ICB 联合治疗对肿瘤微环境产生了重大的免疫影响。