Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Int Dent J. 2021 Dec;71(6):477-483. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
The management of endodontically treated teeth with apical periodontitis is debated among clinicians. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment choices for endodontically treated teeth with different sizes of periapical lesions among endodontists, endodontics postgraduate students, general dental practitioners, and undergraduate students who had fulfilled their theoretical and clinical training in endodontics.
Periapical lesion images (no periapical lesion and 1-mm, 3-mm, and 5-mm periapical lesions) were formed on 4 different radiographs with a software program, and the survey included 16 radiographs that were emailed to 1881 participants. Treatment options included extraction, surgical or nonsurgical retreatment, and wait and see. The χ test was used to compare the responses of the participants.
The survey was returned by 1039 participants (55.23%). There were statistically significant differences among the responses of all participants for all cases (P < .05), except a case with a broken file and no lesion (P = .918). All participants decided to extract at an increased size from a 1-mm periapical lesion to a 5-mm periapical lesion. At all lesion sizes, general dental practitioners planned retreatment less when compared with other groups.
This survey study showed that there was a positive correlation between endodontic education level and retreatment decision-making. Dentists who confront seemingly hopeless endodontically treated teeth such as an instrument fracture, a missing canal, or a large periapical lesion should consult with an endodontist before making the decision to extract the tooth.
根尖周病的根管治疗牙的处理在临床医生中存在争议。本研究旨在评估牙髓病学研究生、全科牙医、本科生等在完成牙髓病学理论和临床培训后,对不同大小根尖周病变的根管治疗牙的治疗选择。
使用软件程序在 4 张不同的 X 光片上形成根尖周病变图像(无根尖周病变和 1mm、3mm 和 5mm 的根尖周病变),并将包含 16 张 X 光片的调查通过电子邮件发送给 1881 名参与者。治疗选择包括拔牙、手术或非手术再治疗以及观察等待。使用 χ 检验比较参与者的反应。
共有 1039 名参与者(55.23%)回复了调查。除了有断针和无病变的病例(P = .918)外,所有病例的所有参与者的反应均存在统计学差异(P <.05)。所有参与者都决定从 1mm 的根尖周病变增加到 5mm 的根尖周病变时进行拔牙。在所有病变大小中,全科牙医计划再治疗的比例均低于其他组。
这项调查研究表明,牙髓病学教育水平与再治疗决策之间存在正相关。对于那些面临似乎无法挽救的根管治疗牙的牙医,如器械折断、根管缺失或较大的根尖周病变,在决定拔牙之前,应咨询牙髓病学家。