Suppr超能文献

正义与重度老年痴呆患者

Justice and the severely demented elderly.

作者信息

Brock D W

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 1988 Feb;13(1):73-99. doi: 10.1093/jmp/13.1.73.

Abstract

In this paper I address the relation between just claims to health care and severe cognitive impairment from dementia. Two general approaches to justice in allocation of health care are distinguished--prudential allocation and interpersonal distribution. First, I analyze why a patient who has died has no further claims to health care. Second, I show why prudential allocators would not provide for health care treatment should they be in a persistent vegetative state. Third, I argue that the destruction of personal identity from severe dementia implies that only claims to palliative, but not life-sustaining, health care remain. Finally, I argue that the prudential allocator approach is indeterminate regarding life-sustaining care for the moderately demented and that social policy should not deny that care to patients.

摘要

在本文中,我探讨了医疗保健的合理诉求与痴呆导致的严重认知障碍之间的关系。在医疗保健分配中的正义问题上,有两种一般方法被区分开来——审慎分配和人际分配。首先,我分析了为什么已经去世的患者不再对医疗保健有进一步的诉求。其次,我说明了为什么审慎的分配者如果处于持续植物人状态就不会提供医疗保健治疗。第三,我认为严重痴呆导致的个人身份丧失意味着仅存在对姑息性而非维持生命的医疗保健的诉求。最后,我认为审慎分配者的方法在为中度痴呆患者提供维持生命的护理方面是不确定的,并且社会政策不应拒绝为患者提供这种护理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验