Suppr超能文献

鸽子的颜色偏好:避免蓝色刺激时的刺激强度和强化偶然性效应

Color preference in pigeons: stimulus intensity and reinforcement contingency effects in the avoidance of blue stimuli.

作者信息

Biederman G B, McDonald K G, Heighington G A, Vanayan M

机构信息

Division of Life Sciences, Scarborough Campus, University Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Mar;49(2):265-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-265.

Abstract

In a procedure intended to determine color preference in pigeons (which partially replicated Catania, Owens, & von Lossberg, 1983), two keys were illuminated by different colors drawn from a set of amber, red, green, or blue stimuli; this was followed by the presentation of grain when either of the two colors was pecked. The grain was illuminated alternately across trials with the colors presented on the keys. In Experiment 1 the intensity of the color stimuli used was not equalized, whereas in Experiment 2 the intensity of the colors was equalized. The low preference for blue found in Experiment 1, as measured by differential key pecking, was not found in Experiment 2. The discriminability of the intensity-equalized colors was confirmed in Experiment 2a, in which equal-intensity color discrimination problems were presented. In Experiment 3, as in Catania et al. (1983), a response-independent reinforcement schedule was used, but with intensity-equalized colors. In contrast to Experiment 2, very low preference for blue was found here and in Experiment 4, which used a within-subject procedure. These findings suggest that pigeon color preference may be a function of intensity, but all controlling variables have not as yet been identified.

摘要

在一项旨在确定鸽子颜色偏好的实验程序中(该实验部分重复了卡塔尼亚、欧文斯和冯·洛斯伯格于1983年进行的实验),两个按键分别被一组琥珀色、红色、绿色或蓝色刺激中的不同颜色照亮;当啄这两种颜色中的任意一种时,随后会呈现谷物。在不同的实验试次中,谷物会交替被按键上呈现的颜色照亮。在实验1中,所使用的颜色刺激强度未进行均衡处理,而在实验2中,颜色强度进行了均衡处理。通过按键啄击差异测量发现,实验1中对蓝色的偏好较低,但在实验2中未发现这一现象。在实验2a中证实了强度均衡颜色的可辨别性,该实验呈现了等强度颜色辨别问题。在实验3中,与卡塔尼亚等人(1983年)的实验一样,使用了与反应无关的强化程序,但颜色强度进行了均衡处理。与实验2不同的是,在实验3以及采用被试内程序的实验4中,发现对蓝色的偏好非常低。这些发现表明,鸽子的颜色偏好可能是强度的函数,但尚未确定所有的控制变量。

相似文献

4
Generalization peak shift for autoshaped and operant key pecks.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Mar;57(2):127-43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-127.
5
Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting-delay procedure.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jul;66(1):63-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-63.
6
Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):63-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-63.
7
Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli: II. Effects of changes in stimulus probability.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jan;31(1):15-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-15.
8
Super-resurgence: ABA renewal increases resurgence.
Behav Processes. 2015 Jun;115:70-3. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
9
Temporal discrimination and a free-operant psychophysical procedure.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Mar;33(2):167-85. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-167.
10
An investigation of peak shift and behavioral contrast for autoshaped and operant behavior.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Jan;33(1):101-18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-101.

本文引用的文献

1
Autoshaped responding: A baseline for studying stimulus preference.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):251-6. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-251.
2
Stimulus bias in the absence of food reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):711-4. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-711.
3
Stimulus function in simultaneous discrimination.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jul;11(4):459-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-459.
4
Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):1-8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-1.
5
Colour preferences in the pigeon: a behavioural and psychopharmacological study.
Psychopharmacologia. 1975 Aug 21;43(2):175-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00421021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验