Biederman G B, McDonald K G, Heighington G A, Vanayan M
Division of Life Sciences, Scarborough Campus, University Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Mar;49(2):265-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-265.
In a procedure intended to determine color preference in pigeons (which partially replicated Catania, Owens, & von Lossberg, 1983), two keys were illuminated by different colors drawn from a set of amber, red, green, or blue stimuli; this was followed by the presentation of grain when either of the two colors was pecked. The grain was illuminated alternately across trials with the colors presented on the keys. In Experiment 1 the intensity of the color stimuli used was not equalized, whereas in Experiment 2 the intensity of the colors was equalized. The low preference for blue found in Experiment 1, as measured by differential key pecking, was not found in Experiment 2. The discriminability of the intensity-equalized colors was confirmed in Experiment 2a, in which equal-intensity color discrimination problems were presented. In Experiment 3, as in Catania et al. (1983), a response-independent reinforcement schedule was used, but with intensity-equalized colors. In contrast to Experiment 2, very low preference for blue was found here and in Experiment 4, which used a within-subject procedure. These findings suggest that pigeon color preference may be a function of intensity, but all controlling variables have not as yet been identified.
在一项旨在确定鸽子颜色偏好的实验程序中(该实验部分重复了卡塔尼亚、欧文斯和冯·洛斯伯格于1983年进行的实验),两个按键分别被一组琥珀色、红色、绿色或蓝色刺激中的不同颜色照亮;当啄这两种颜色中的任意一种时,随后会呈现谷物。在不同的实验试次中,谷物会交替被按键上呈现的颜色照亮。在实验1中,所使用的颜色刺激强度未进行均衡处理,而在实验2中,颜色强度进行了均衡处理。通过按键啄击差异测量发现,实验1中对蓝色的偏好较低,但在实验2中未发现这一现象。在实验2a中证实了强度均衡颜色的可辨别性,该实验呈现了等强度颜色辨别问题。在实验3中,与卡塔尼亚等人(1983年)的实验一样,使用了与反应无关的强化程序,但颜色强度进行了均衡处理。与实验2不同的是,在实验3以及采用被试内程序的实验4中,发现对蓝色的偏好非常低。这些发现表明,鸽子的颜色偏好可能是强度的函数,但尚未确定所有的控制变量。