• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在调整延迟程序中对确定性和不确定性强化物的选择。

Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting-delay procedure.

作者信息

Mazur J E

机构信息

Psychology Department, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, Connecticut 06515, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jul;66(1):63-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-63.

DOI:10.1901/jeab.1996.66-63
PMID:8755700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1284553/
Abstract

A discrete-trials adjusting-delay procedure was used to investigate the conditions under which pigeons might show a preference for partial reinforcement over 100% reinforcement, an effect reported in a number of previous experiments. A peck on a red key always led to a delay with red houselights and then food. In each condition, the duration of the red-houselight delay was adjusted to estimate an indifference point. In 100% reinforcement conditions, a peck on a green key always led to a delay with green houselights and then food. In partial-reinforcement conditions, a peck on the green key led either to the green houselights and food or to white houselights and no food. In some phases of the experiment, statistically significant preference for partial reinforcement over 100% reinforcement was found, but this effect was observed in only about half of the pigeons. The effect was largely eliminated when variability in the delay stimulus colors was equated for 50% reinforcement conditions and 100% reinforcement conditions. Idiosyncratic preferences for certain colors or for stimulus variability may be at least partially responsible for the effect.

摘要

采用离散试验调整延迟程序来研究鸽子在何种条件下可能表现出对部分强化的偏好超过100%强化,这一效应在之前的一些实验中已有报道。啄红色按键总会导致红色饲养灯光亮起延迟,随后给予食物。在每种条件下,调整红色饲养灯光延迟的时长以估计无差异点。在100%强化条件下,啄绿色按键总会导致绿色饲养灯光亮起延迟,随后给予食物。在部分强化条件下,啄绿色按键要么导致绿色饲养灯光亮起并给予食物,要么导致白色饲养灯光亮起且不给食物。在实验的某些阶段,发现鸽子对部分强化的偏好超过100%强化具有统计学显著性,但这种效应仅在约一半的鸽子中观察到。当50%强化条件和100%强化条件下延迟刺激颜色的变异性相等时,这种效应在很大程度上被消除。对某些颜色或刺激变异性的特殊偏好可能至少部分导致了这一效应。

相似文献

1
Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting-delay procedure.在调整延迟程序中对确定性和不确定性强化物的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jul;66(1):63-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-63.
2
Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.条件性强化以及对延迟和不确定的初级强化物的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Mar;63(2):139-50. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-139.
3
Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.概率性强化条件下的选择:延迟和条件性强化物的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):63-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-63.
4
Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.延迟和概率性强化物的选择:变异性、试验间隔时间和条件性强化物的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Nov;58(3):513-25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-513.
5
Influences of delay and rate of reinforcement on discrete-trial choice.延迟和强化率对离散试验选择的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1985 Oct;11(4):565-75.
6
Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of prereinforcer and postreinforcer stimuli.具有延迟和概率性强化物的选择:强化前和强化后刺激的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Nov;70(3):253-65. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-253.
7
Theories of probabilistic reinforcement.概率强化理论
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jan;51(1):87-99. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-87.
8
Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.试验间强化物对自我控制选择的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):83-96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-83.
9
Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.单一延迟强化物与多个延迟强化物之间的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):67-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67.
10
Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.作为离散试验选择因素的强化概率与延迟
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):341-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-341.

引用本文的文献

1
The functional equivalence of two variants of the suboptimal choice task: choice proportion and response latency as measures of value.两种次优选择任务变体的功能等价性:选择比例和反应时作为价值的衡量标准。
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jan;24(1):85-98. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01418-8. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
2
Procrastination in the pigeon: Can conditioned reinforcement increase the likelihood of human procrastination?鸽子的拖延:条件强化会增加人类拖延的可能性吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1952-1957. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1409-2.
3
Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: 'jackpot' signals promote maladaptive risky choice.鸽子的类赌博行为:“ jackpot”信号促进了适应不良的风险选择。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 26;7(1):6625. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06641-x.
4
Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies.鸽子的次优选择:刺激值预测对频率的选择。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159336. eCollection 2016.
5
Suboptimal choice by pigeons: an analog of human gambling behavior.鸽子的次优选择:人类赌博行为的一种类似情况。
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:156-64. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
6
The adaptive analysis of visual cognition using genetic algorithms.使用遗传算法对视觉认知进行自适应分析。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Oct;39(4):357-76. doi: 10.1037/a0034074. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
7
Risky choice in pigeons: preference for amount variability using a token-reinforcement system.鸽子的冒险选择:使用代币强化系统偏好数量变化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Sep;98(2):139-54. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-139.
8
Toward an operant model of power in organizations.迈向组织权力的操作性模型。
Behav Anal. 2003 Spring;26(1):131-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03392071.
9
Sub-Optimal Choice by Pigeons: Failure to Support The Allais Paradox.鸽子的次优选择:对阿莱悖论的不支持
Learn Motiv. 2011 Aug 1;42(3):245-254. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2011.03.002.
10
Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule.在调整延迟计划下的过渡和稳态选择行为。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Jan;95(1):57-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-57.

本文引用的文献

1
Choice between reliable and unreliable reinforcement alternatives revisited: Preference for unreliable reinforcement.重新审视可靠和不可靠强化物选择之间的关系:对不可靠强化物的偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):353-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-353.
2
Percentage reinforcement and choice.百分比强化与选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Nov;32(3):335-40. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-335.
3
Preference for intermittent reinforcement.偏好间歇性强化。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):463-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-463.
4
Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus.观察负辨别刺激的惩罚。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):37-44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-37.
5
Choice and rate of reinforcement.强化的选择和比率。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):723-30. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-723.
6
The role of observing responses in discrimination learning.观察反应在辨别学习中的作用。
Psychol Rev. 1952 Nov;59(6):431-42. doi: 10.1037/h0053932.
7
Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.条件性强化以及对延迟和不确定的初级强化物的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Mar;63(2):139-50. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-139.
8
Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.作为离散试验选择因素的强化概率与延迟
J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 May;43(3):341-51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-341.
9
Fixed and variable ratios and delays: further tests of an equivalence rule.固定与可变比率及延迟:等价规则的进一步测试
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1986 Apr;12(2):116-24.
10
Theories of probabilistic reinforcement.概率强化理论
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jan;51(1):87-99. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-87.