• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学临床教师需要了解的内容。

What clinical teachers in medicine need to know.

作者信息

Irby D M

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 98195.

出版信息

Acad Med. 1994 May;69(5):333-42. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199405000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00001888-199405000-00003
PMID:8166912
Abstract

In order to identify the components of knowledge that effective clinical teachers of medicine need, the author carried out a qualitative study of six distinguished clinical teachers in general internal medicine in 1991. Using data from interviews, a structured task, and observations of each ward team, he identified six domains of knowledge essential to teaching excellence in the context of teaching rounds: clinical knowledge of medicine, patients, and the context of practice, as well as educational knowledge of learners, general principles of teaching and case-based teaching scripts. When combined, these domains of knowledge allow attending physicians to engage in clinical instructional reasoning and to target their teaching to the specific needs of their learners. The results of this investigation are discussed in relation to both prior research on teacher knowledge, reasoning, and action and faculty development in medicine.

摘要

为了确定优秀的临床医学教师所需的知识构成要素,作者于1991年对六位内科领域杰出的临床教师进行了定性研究。通过访谈、结构化任务以及对每个病房团队的观察所收集的数据,他确定了在教学查房背景下卓越教学所需的六个知识领域:医学临床知识、患者知识、实践背景知识,以及学习者的教育知识、教学一般原则和基于病例的教学脚本。这些知识领域相结合,使主治医师能够进行临床教学推理,并根据学习者的特定需求开展教学。本文将结合先前关于教师知识、推理和行动以及医学教师发展的研究来讨论这项调查的结果。

相似文献

1
What clinical teachers in medicine need to know.医学临床教师需要了解的内容。
Acad Med. 1994 May;69(5):333-42. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199405000-00003.
2
How attending physicians make instructional decisions when conducting teaching rounds.主治医师在进行教学查房时如何做出教学决策。
Acad Med. 1992 Oct;67(10):630-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199210000-00002.
3
Three exemplary models of case-based teaching.基于案例教学的三种示范模式。
Acad Med. 1994 Dec;69(12):947-53. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199412000-00003.
4
Excellence in clinical teaching: knowledge transformation and development required.卓越的临床教学:需要知识转化与发展。
Med Educ. 2014 Aug;48(8):776-84. doi: 10.1111/medu.12507.
5
Is there a relationship between attending physicians' and residents' teaching skills and students' examination scores?主治医生和住院医生的教学技能与学生的考试成绩之间有关系吗?
Acad Med. 2000 Nov;75(11):1144-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200011000-00024.
6
Cognitive load in internal medicine: What every clinical teacher should know about cognitive load theory.内科的认知负荷:每位临床教师都应该了解的认知负荷理论。
Eur J Intern Med. 2019 Feb;60:4-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
7
Intensive Care Unit Educators: A Multicenter Evaluation of Behaviors Residents Value in Attending Physicians.重症监护病房教育工作者:对住院医师重视的主治医师行为的多中心评估
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Apr;14(4):513-516. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-996BC.
8
Teaching strategies used by internal medicine residents on the wards.内科住院医师在病房中使用的教学策略。
Med Teach. 2011;33(12):e697-703. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.611838.
9
New instrument for evaluating teaching faculty, incorporating the changed expectations of today's teachers.用于评估教师的新工具,融入了当今对教师不断变化的期望。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jan;20(1):98; author reply 98. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04006_2.x.
10
How Exemplary Inpatient Teaching Physicians Foster Clinical Reasoning.典范住院教学医师如何促进临床推理
Am J Med. 2017 Sep;130(9):1113.e1-1113.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.03.050. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Curriculum Innovations: High-Fidelity Simulation of Acute Neurology Enhances Rising Resident Confidence: Results From a Multicohort Study.课程创新:急性神经病学的高保真模拟增强住院医师的信心:一项多队列研究的结果
Neurol Educ. 2022 Nov 15;1(2):e200022. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200022. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Satisfaction with Clinical Clerkship and Its Determinants Among Korean Medicine Students.韩医学专业学生对临床实习的满意度及其影响因素
J Pharmacopuncture. 2025 Jun 30;28(2):108-115. doi: 10.3831/KPI.2025.28.2.108.
3
A Novel Tool to Assess Faculty Development Needs Utilizing Student Evaluations.
一种利用学生评价来评估教师发展需求的新型工具。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e74008. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74008. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Constructing psychometric measurement of a past supervised experience scale with educational roles to investigate the relationship between being instructed, being supported, and being supervised for attending physicians in teaching hospitals - a questionnaire survey.构建具有教育角色的过去监督经验量表的心理测量学测量,以调查教学医院住院医师接受指导、支持和监督之间的关系 - 问卷调查。
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2405473. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2405473. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
5
Breaking the error chain with SEE: cascade analysis of endodontic errors in clinical training.利用 SEE 打破错误链:根管治疗临床培训中的级联错误分析。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2268348. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2268348. Epub 2023 Oct 8.
6
Supervisory knowing in practice across medical specialities.医学各专业实践中的监督性认知。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Mar;29(1):107-128. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10251-w. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
7
What do patients think about the Hungarian health care system and medical students' learning outcomes? A cross-sectional study on the patients' perspective in Hungary.患者如何看待匈牙利的医疗保健系统和医学生的学习成果?一项基于匈牙利患者视角的横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 25;23(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04350-w.
8
The Development and Validation of a Professional Development Program for Health Professional Educators in Ethiopian Higher Education Context.埃塞俄比亚高等教育背景下卫生专业教育工作者专业发展项目的开发与验证
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Sep 15;32(5):1095-1106. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01630-w. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
Evaluating Clinical Educators' Competence in an East Asian Context: Who Values What?评估东亚背景下临床教育工作者的能力:谁重视什么?
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 28;9:896822. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.896822. eCollection 2022.
10
A heutagogical interactive tutorial involving Fishbowl with Fish Battle and Round Robin Brainstorming: A novel syndicate metacognitive learning strategy.一种基于鱼缸式讨论、鱼之战斗和循环头脑风暴的 heutagogical 交互式教程:一种新颖的小组元认知学习策略。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Feb;77(Suppl 1):S73-S78. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.12.003. Epub 2021 Feb 2.