Suppr超能文献

用于医疗应用的“卡扣式”独立单床氧气浓缩器的实验设计。

Experimental design of a "Snap-on" and standalone single-bed oxygen concentrator for medical applications.

作者信息

Vemula Rama Rao, Urich Matthew D, Kothare Mayuresh V

机构信息

Present Address: Air Products & Chemicals Inc., 7201 Hamilton Blvd, Allentown, PA 18195 USA.

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA.

出版信息

Adsorption (Boston). 2021;27(4):619-628. doi: 10.1007/s10450-021-00299-8. Epub 2021 Feb 13.

Abstract

A novel single-bed, "Snap-on" and standalone, medical oxygen concentrator design based on a rapid pressure swing adsorption process was investigated for continuous oxygen supply. The Snap-on concentrator design is easy to hook up to an existing compressed air source, and the unit can then be readily used to produce oxygen for medical applications. It is easily transportable and compared to a traditional oxygen concentrator with its dedicated compressor, the Snap-on concentrator is particularly relevant for the oxygen therapy needs of a larger number of patients in situations such as COVID-19. A commercially available LiLSX zeolite was used for the separation of oxygen from compressed ambient air. The experiments were performed at different feed air pressures using a constant supply of house air in the lab. Further, the device performance was also analyzed using a standalone medium size air compressor. The minimum bed size factor obtained with compressed house air was 100 lb/tons per day contained (TPDc) O at a cycle time of 7 s, whereas the minimum bed size factor obtained with a medium size air compressor weighing about 12 lbs was 210 lb/TPD O at a cycle time of 14.5 s under the same feed pressures of 3.1 bar at an oxygen product purity of 90%. The product oxygen flow rate was nearly double for the same amount of adsorbent when using house air for the Snap-on design. The primary reason for this significantly higher oxygen production was the substantially higher and stable air throughput capacity of a typical house air compressor that enabled rapid cycling of the process at near-constant feed pressure compared to a medium size compressor used in a medical oxygen concentrator. The oxygen recovery was approximately 34% for both cases. Thus, the Snap-on oxygen concentrator was found to be easier to build and it delivered more oxygen for medical use compared to standalone units in locations where a constant supply of compressed feed air is available. This is typically the case in facilities such as hospitals, military medical camps and cruise ships. Further, the Snap-on design offers other benefits such as ease of transportation, higher reliability and lower weight.

摘要

研究了一种基于快速变压吸附工艺的新型单床、“卡扣式”独立医用制氧机设计,用于持续供氧。卡扣式制氧机设计易于连接到现有的压缩空气源,然后该装置可方便地用于生产医疗用氧气。它便于运输,与配备专用压缩机的传统制氧机相比,卡扣式制氧机对于大量患者(如在新冠疫情等情况下)的氧疗需求尤为适用。使用市售的LiLSX沸石从压缩的环境空气中分离氧气。实验在不同的进气压力下进行,实验室使用恒定供应的室内空气。此外,还使用独立的中型空气压缩机对设备性能进行了分析。在7秒的循环时间下,使用压缩室内空气获得的最小床层尺寸系数为每天每短吨含氧量(TPDc)100磅,而在相同的3.1巴进气压力和90%的氧气产品纯度下,使用一台重约12磅的中型空气压缩机,在14.5秒的循环时间下获得的最小床层尺寸系数为210磅/TPD氧气。对于卡扣式设计,使用室内空气时,相同量的吸附剂产生的产品氧气流量几乎翻倍。氧气产量显著更高的主要原因是典型的室内空气压缩机具有更高且稳定的空气处理能力,与医用制氧机中使用的中型压缩机相比,它能够在近乎恒定的进气压力下使工艺快速循环。两种情况下的氧气回收率均约为34%。因此,发现在有恒定压缩进气供应的场所,卡扣式制氧机比独立装置更易于制造且能提供更多医疗用氧气。医院、军事医疗营地和游轮等设施通常就是这种情况。此外,卡扣式设计还具有其他优点,如便于运输、可靠性更高和重量更轻。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3772/7882046/9d600071ee63/10450_2021_299_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验