Mickan Bede S, Alsharmani Ahmed R, Solaiman Zakaria M, Leopold Matthias, Abbott Lynette K
UWA School of Agriculture and Environment (M079), The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
UWA Institute of Agriculture (M082), The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 4;11:550169. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.550169. eCollection 2020.
Biostimulants are gaining momentum as potential soil amendments to increase plant health and productivity. Plant growth responses to some biostimulants and poorly soluble fertilizers could increase soil microbial diversity and provide greater plant access to less soluble nutrients. We assessed an agricultural soil amended with a multispecies microbial biostimulant in comparison with two fertilizers that differed in elemental solubilities to identify effects on soil bacterial communities associated with two annual pasture species (subterranean clover and Wimmera ryegrass). The treatments applied were: a multispecies microbial biostimulant, a poorly soluble rock mineral fertilizer at a rate of 5.6 kg P ha, a chemical fertilizer at a rate of 5.6 kg P ha, and a negative control with no fertilizer or microbial biostimulant. The two annual pasture species were grown separately for 10 weeks in a glasshouse with soil maintained at 70% of field capacity. Soil bacteria were studied using 16S rRNA with 27F and 519R bacterial primers on the Mi-seq platform. The microbial biostimulant had no effect on growth of either of the pasture species. However, it did influence soil biodiversity in a way that was dependent on the plant species. While application of the fertilizers increased plant growth, they were both associated with the lowest diversity of the soil bacterial community based on Fisher and Inverse Simpson indices. Additionally, these responses were plant-dependent; soil bacterial richness was highly correlated with soil pH for subterranean clover but not for Wimmera ryegrass. Soil bacterial richness was lowest following application of each fertilizer when subterranean clover was grown. In contrast, for Wimmera ryegrass, soil bacterial richness was lowest for the control and rock mineral fertilizer. Beta diversity at the bacterial OTU level of resolution by permanova demonstrated a significant impact of soil amendments, plant species and an interaction between plant type and soil amendments. This experiment highlights the complexity of how soil amendments, including microbial biostimulants, may influence soil bacterial communities associated with different plant species, and shows that caution is required when linking soil biodiversity to plant growth. In this case, the microbial biostimulant influenced soil biodiversity without influencing plant growth.
生物刺激剂作为潜在的土壤改良剂,在提高植物健康和生产力方面正日益受到关注。植物对某些生物刺激剂和难溶性肥料的生长反应可能会增加土壤微生物多样性,并使植物更容易获取难溶性养分。我们评估了一种用多物种微生物生物刺激剂改良的农业土壤,并与两种元素溶解度不同的肥料进行比较,以确定其对与两种一年生牧草(地下三叶草和维梅拉黑麦草)相关的土壤细菌群落的影响。所应用的处理方法为:一种多物种微生物生物刺激剂、一种施用量为5.6千克磷/公顷的难溶性岩石矿物肥料、一种施用量为5.6千克磷/公顷的化学肥料,以及一个不施肥或不使用微生物生物刺激剂的阴性对照。这两种一年生牧草分别在温室中种植10周,土壤保持在田间持水量的70%。在Mi-seq平台上,使用带有27F和519R细菌引物的16S rRNA对土壤细菌进行研究。微生物生物刺激剂对两种牧草的生长均无影响。然而,它确实以一种依赖于植物种类的方式影响了土壤生物多样性。虽然施肥增加了植物生长,但根据费舍尔指数和反辛普森指数,它们都与土壤细菌群落的最低多样性相关。此外,这些反应还依赖于植物;地下三叶草的土壤细菌丰富度与土壤pH高度相关,而维梅拉黑麦草则不然。种植地下三叶草时,施用每种肥料后土壤细菌丰富度最低。相比之下,对于维梅拉黑麦草,对照和岩石矿物肥料处理下的土壤细菌丰富度最低。通过permanova在细菌OTU水平分辨率下的β多样性表明,土壤改良、植物种类以及植物类型与土壤改良之间的相互作用具有显著影响。该实验突出了包括微生物生物刺激剂在内的土壤改良如何影响与不同植物种类相关的土壤细菌群落的复杂性,并表明在将土壤生物多样性与植物生长联系起来时需要谨慎。在这种情况下,微生物生物刺激剂影响了土壤生物多样性,但没有影响植物生长。