Wei Xiao-Li, Xu Jian-Ying, Wang De-Shen, Chen Dong-Liang, Ren Chao, Li Jia-Ning, Wang Feng, Wang Feng-Hua, Xu Rui-Hua
Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Clinical Trial Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Jan 31;13:1758835921988996. doi: 10.1177/1758835921988996. eCollection 2021.
We previously reported tumor mutation burden (TMB) as a potential prognostic factor for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) receiving immunotherapy. We aimed to comprehensively understand the impact of tumor burden and TMB on efficacy and prognosis in immunotherapy-treated AGC patients.
A total of 58 patients with refractory AGC receiving PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy from a phase Ib/II clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02915432) were retrospectively included. Univariate and multivariate logistical regression analyses and the Cox proportional hazards model were performed for prognostic value of baseline factors. Factors reflecting baseline tumor burden, including baseline lesion number (BLN), the maximum tumor size (MTS) and the sum of target lesion size (SLS) were analyzed. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were compared by Chi-square test.
In univariate analysis, high BLN was associated with poor median progression-free survival (mPFS) [1.7 months 3.4 months; hazard ratio (HR), 2.696, < 0.05] and median overall survival (mOS) (3.2 months 7.6 months; HR, 1.997, < 0.05), while high TMB was a positive prognostic factor. In multivariable analysis, both BLN and TMB were independent prognostic factors for mOS (BLN: HR, 2.782, < 0.05; TMB: HR, 0.288, < 0.05), while MTS or SLS had no association with survival. Better ORR and DCR were observed in the low BLN group (15.4% 5.3%, > 0.05; 86.96% 54.29%, < 0.05). When combining BLN and TMB, the best efficacy and survival were observed in the BLNTMB group (ORR: 37.5%, DCR: 62.5%, mPFS and mOS: not reached). The worst efficacy and survival were shown in the BNLTMB group [ORR: 0% (0/15); DCR: 13.3%; mPFS: 1.7 months; mOS: 2.7 months (all < 0.05)].
BLN, rather than factors regarding baseline tumor size, is perhaps a potential predictor for benefit from immunotherapy and its combination with TMB could further risk-stratify patients with AGC receiving immunotherapy.
我们之前报道过肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)作为晚期胃癌(AGC)患者接受免疫治疗的潜在预后因素。我们旨在全面了解肿瘤负荷和TMB对接受免疫治疗的AGC患者疗效和预后的影响。
回顾性纳入了来自一项Ib/II期临床试验(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02915432)的58例接受PD-1抑制剂单药治疗的难治性AGC患者。对基线因素的预后价值进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析以及Cox比例风险模型分析。分析了反映基线肿瘤负荷的因素,包括基线病变数量(BLN)、最大肿瘤大小(MTS)和靶病变大小总和(SLS)。通过卡方检验比较客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。
在单因素分析中,高BLN与较差的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)相关[1.7个月对3.4个月;风险比(HR),2.696,P<0.05]和中位总生存期(mOS)(3.2个月对7.6个月;HR,1.997,P<0.05),而高TMB是一个阳性预后因素。在多因素分析中,BLN和TMB都是mOS的独立预后因素(BLN:HR,2.782,P<0.05;TMB:HR,0.288,P<0.05),而MTS或SLS与生存无关联。低BLN组观察到更好的ORR和DCR(15.4%对5.3%,P>0.05;86.96%对54.29%,P<0.05)。当结合BLN和TMB时,BLN低TMB高组观察到最佳疗效和生存(ORR:37.5%,DCR:62.5%,mPFS和mOS:未达到)。BLN高TMB低组显示出最差的疗效和生存[ORR:0%(0/15);DCR:13.3%;mPFS:1.7个月;mOS:2个月(均P<0.05)]。
BLN而非基线肿瘤大小相关因素可能是免疫治疗获益的潜在预测指标,其与TMB联合可进一步对接受免疫治疗的AGC患者进行风险分层。