Mai Dinh Van Chi, Sagar Alex, Menon Nainika Suresh, Claydon Oliver, Park Ji Young, Down Billy, Keeler Barrie David
General Surgery, Milton Keynes University Hospital, Standing Way, Milton Keynes, MK6 5LD, UK.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Mar;63:102160. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
During the first United Kingdom COVID-19 wave, the Royal Colleges of Surgeons initially recommended conservative management with antibiotics instead of surgery for appendicitis. This study compared local outcomes of appendicitis during this period with a pre-COVID-19 cohort.
An observational study was conducted in a district general hospital. All episodes of appendicitis were prospectively studied from 25 March 2020 until 26 May 2020 and compared with a retrospective pre-COVID cohort from 27 November 2019 until 29 January 2020. Primary outcome was 30-day treatment failure of simple appendicitis for conservatively managed cases during COVID-19 compared to surgically managed cases pre-pandemic. Treatment failure was defined as any unplanned radiological or surgical intervention.
Over nine weeks, there were 39 cases of appendicitis during COVID-19 and 50 cases pre-COVID-19. Twenty-six and 50 cases underwent appendicectomy during and pre-COVID-19 respectively. There was no difference in 30-day postoperative complication rates and nor were there any peri-operative COVID-19 infections.Twelve cases of simple appendicitis underwent conservative management during COVID-19 and were compared with 23 operatively managed simple cases pre-pandemic. There was a higher failure rate in the conservative versus operative group (33.3 vs 0% OR = 24.88, 95% CI 1.21 to 512.9, ). Length of stay was similar (1.5 vs 2.0 ).
Locally, conservative management was more likely to fail than initial appendicectomy. We suggest that surgery should remain first line for appendicitis, with conservative management reserved for those with suspected or proven COVID-19 infection.
在英国第一波新冠疫情期间,皇家外科医学院最初建议对阑尾炎采用抗生素保守治疗而非手术治疗。本研究将这一时期阑尾炎的局部治疗结果与新冠疫情前的队列进行了比较。
在一家区综合医院进行了一项观察性研究。对2020年3月25日至2020年5月26日期间所有阑尾炎发作进行前瞻性研究,并与2019年11月27日至2020年1月29日的新冠疫情前回顾性队列进行比较。主要结局是新冠疫情期间保守治疗的单纯性阑尾炎与疫情前手术治疗的病例相比30天治疗失败情况。治疗失败定义为任何计划外的放射学或手术干预。
在九周内,新冠疫情期间有39例阑尾炎病例,新冠疫情前有50例。新冠疫情期间和疫情前分别有26例和50例接受了阑尾切除术。术后30天并发症发生率没有差异,也没有围手术期新冠病毒感染病例。新冠疫情期间有12例单纯性阑尾炎接受了保守治疗,并与疫情前23例手术治疗的单纯病例进行了比较。保守治疗组的失败率高于手术治疗组(33.3%对0%,比值比=24.88,95%置信区间1.21至512.9)。住院时间相似(1.5天对2.0天)。
在当地,保守治疗比最初的阑尾切除术更有可能失败。我们建议阑尾炎的一线治疗仍应是手术,保守治疗应保留给疑似或确诊感染新冠病毒的患者。