Suppr超能文献

急性阑尾炎的阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗对比

Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Wilms Ingrid M H A, de Hoog Dominique E N M, de Visser Dianne C, Janzing Heinrich M J

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine,VieCuri Medical Centre of Northern Limburg, Venlo, Netherlands.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9(11):CD008359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Present day treatment of choice for acute appendicitis is appendectomy, however complications are inherent to operative treatment. Though surgical appendectomy remains the standard treatment, several investigators have investigated conservative antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis and reported good results.

OBJECTIVES

Is antibiotic treatment as effective as surgical appendectomy (laparoscopic or open) in patients with acute appendicitis on recovery within two weeks, without major complications (including recurrence) within one year?

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 6, 2011); MEDLINE (until June 2011); EMBASE (until June 2011); Prospective Trial Registers (June 2011) and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised clinical trials (RCT and qRCT) comparing antibiotic treatment with appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis were included. Excluded were studies which primarily focused on the complications of acute appendicitis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors contacted the trial authors for additional information if required. Statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager and MetaAnalyst. A non-inferiority analysis was performed, comparing antibiotic treatment (ABT) to the gold standard (appendectomy). By consensus, a 20% margin of non-inferiority was considered clinically relevant.

MAIN RESULTS

Five RCT's (901 patients) were assessed. In total 73.4% (95% CI 62.7 to 81.9) of patients who were treated with antibiotics and 97.4 (95% CI 94.4 to 98.8) patients who directly got an appendectomy were cured within two weeks without major complications (including recurrence) within one year. The lower 95% CI was 15.2% below the 20% margin for the primary outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The upper bound of the 95% CI of ABT for cure within two weeks without major complications crosses the 20% margin of appendectomy, so the outcome is inconclusive. Also the quality of the studies was low to moderate, for that reason the results should be interpret with caution and definite conclusions cannot be made. Therefore we conclude that appendectomy remains the standard treatment for acute appendicitis. Antibiotic treatment might be used as an alternative treatment in a good quality RCT or in specific patients or conditions were surgery is contraindicated.

摘要

背景

急性阑尾炎是急性腹痛最常见的病因之一。目前急性阑尾炎的首选治疗方法是阑尾切除术,然而手术治疗存在固有并发症。尽管手术阑尾切除术仍是标准治疗方法,但一些研究人员对急性阑尾炎的保守抗生素治疗进行了研究,并报告了良好的结果。

目的

对于急性阑尾炎患者,抗生素治疗在两周内康复且一年内无重大并发症(包括复发)方面是否与手术阑尾切除术(腹腔镜或开放手术)同样有效?

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(2卷,2011年第6期);MEDLINE(截至2011年6月);EMBASE(截至2011年6月);前瞻性试验注册库(2011年6月)以及文章的参考文献列表。

选择标准

纳入比较疑似阑尾炎患者抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术的随机和半随机临床试验(RCT和qRCT)。排除主要关注急性阑尾炎并发症的研究。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。如有需要,综述作者会联系试验作者获取更多信息。使用Review Manager和MetaAnalyst进行统计分析。进行了非劣效性分析,将抗生素治疗(ABT)与金标准(阑尾切除术)进行比较。经共识,20%的非劣效性界限被认为具有临床相关性。

主要结果

评估了5项RCT(901例患者)。接受抗生素治疗的患者中,总计73.4%(95%CI 62.7至81.9)在两周内治愈且一年内无重大并发症(包括复发),直接接受阑尾切除术的患者为97.4%(95%CI 94.4至98.8)。主要结局的95%CI下限比20%的界限低15.2%。

作者结论

抗生素治疗在两周内治愈且无重大并发症的95%CI上限超过了阑尾切除术的20%界限,因此结果尚无定论。而且研究质量为低到中等,因此应谨慎解释结果,无法得出明确结论。因此我们得出结论,阑尾切除术仍是急性阑尾炎的标准治疗方法。在高质量RCT中或在特定患者或手术禁忌的情况下,抗生素治疗可作为替代治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验