Suppr超能文献

关于在学习环境背景下开展健康研究的思考

Considerations on Conducting Research on Wellness in the Context of the Learning Environment.

作者信息

Gruppen Larry D, Fogarasi Miklos C

机构信息

Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, Connecticut.

出版信息

Glob Adv Health Med. 2021 Feb 2;10:2164956121989708. doi: 10.1177/2164956121989708. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The learning environment (LE) provides a context for many educational phenomena, of which wellness and burnout are particularly important. The LE can be thought of as consisting of a psychosocial dimension of personal, social, and organizational factors and a sociomaterial dimension that consists of spatial and technical factors. The interplay between elements of the LE and wellness of the participants is complex and only partially understood, requiring further research. Using this multidimensional model to describe and to plan to deliberately modify the learning environment can foster more rigorous and meaningful research evidence about the interaction of wellness and the LE. This article highlights four key considerations that scholars of wellness should consider when exploring the impact of the LE or designing interventions to modify the environment. These include 1) a thoughtful definition and theoretical conceptualization of the LE, 2) clarity about the study variables that are essential to the study question(s), 3) thoughtful and appropriate measurement of those variables, and 4) a study design that balances quality with feasibility. We provide a practical illustration of how these considerations can be applied in studies exploring the intersection of wellness and the LE.

摘要

学习环境(LE)为许多教育现象提供了一个背景,其中健康和职业倦怠尤为重要。学习环境可以被认为由个人、社会和组织因素的心理社会维度以及由空间和技术因素组成的社会物质维度构成。学习环境的要素与参与者健康之间的相互作用是复杂的,目前仅得到部分理解,需要进一步研究。使用这个多维模型来描述并计划有意地改变学习环境,可以催生关于健康与学习环境相互作用的更严谨、更有意义的研究证据。本文重点介绍了健康领域的学者在探索学习环境的影响或设计干预措施来改变环境时应考虑的四个关键因素。这些因素包括:1)对学习环境进行深思熟虑的定义和理论概念化;2)明确对研究问题至关重要的研究变量;3)对这些变量进行深思熟虑且恰当的测量;4)一种在质量和可行性之间取得平衡的研究设计。我们提供了一个实际示例,说明这些因素如何应用于探索健康与学习环境交叉点的研究中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5e/7868483/91f4ac8cf105/10.1177_2164956121989708-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Considerations on Conducting Research on Wellness in the Context of the Learning Environment.
Glob Adv Health Med. 2021 Feb 2;10:2164956121989708. doi: 10.1177/2164956121989708. eCollection 2021.
2
Interventions Designed to Improve the Learning Environment in the Health Professions: A Scoping Review.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Sep 12;7:211. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000211.1. eCollection 2018.
3
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
4
Meaning in Measurement: Evaluating Young Autistic Adults' Active Engagement and Expressed Interest in Quality-of-Life Goals.
Autism Adulthood. 2020 Sep 1;2(3):227-242. doi: 10.1089/aut.2019.0081. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
5
Conceptualizing Learning Environments in the Health Professions.
Acad Med. 2019 Jul;94(7):969-974. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002702.
6
Shifting Focus from Burnout and Wellness toward Individual and Organizational Resilience.
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Oct-Dec;33(5):568-576. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1879651. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
8
Resident-led organizational initiatives to reduce burnout and improve wellness.
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1756-y.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions Designed to Improve the Learning Environment in the Health Professions: A Scoping Review.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Sep 12;7:211. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000211.1. eCollection 2018.
2
Specialty and Lifestyle Preference Changes during Medical School.
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Aug 8;29(4):995-1001. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00790-6. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):510-512. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2008017. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
5
Redesigning the Learning Environment to Promote Learner Well-Being and Professional Development.
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):674-678. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003094.
6
The Distinctions Between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework.
Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):989-994. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003075.
8
Medical student mentoring programs: current insights.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Mar 4;10:113-123. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S154974. eCollection 2019.
9
Conceptualizing Learning Environments in the Health Professions.
Acad Med. 2019 Jul;94(7):969-974. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002702.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验