School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine (PCOM) Georgia, Suwanee, Georgia, USA.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2021 Feb 12;6(1):66-73. doi: 10.1089/can.2019.0013. eCollection 2021.
Over the last few years, a growth in research and interest in medical cannabis (most often referred to as medical marijuana) use have occurred nationally. Medical cannabis has become a treatment option for disease conditions, such as epilepsy, wasting syndrome associated with AIDs, and post-traumatic stress disorder, when traditional medication is ineffective. The objectives were to identify knowledge deficits of the medical cannabis program (MCP) in Connecticut among Connecticut pharmacists and the impact of MCP on Connecticut pharmacy practice and concerns Connecticut pharmacists have regarding medical cannabis use. A cross-sectional survey through an online platform, Google forms, was administered for 2 months (October 15, 2017-December 15, 2017). An e-mail containing the link to the survey was e-mailed to all pharmacists whose e-mail addresses were available from the State of Connecticut's Commission of Pharmacy database ( = 6182). Of those with available e-mail addresses, only 5653 pharmacists received the e-mail; the others were rejected upon receipt of our e-mail. Our survey consists of 16 items related to pharmacist demo- graphic information, knowledge assessment, impact on pharmacists' practice, and concerns stemming from medical cannabis. Only 51 (15.2%) respondents believed that Connecticut MCP would impact their practice. Only 39 (11.6%) respondents selected the two correct requirements for patient registration and correctly identified the wrong choices. Only 81 (24.2%) respondents identified the correct approved dose (maximum allowable monthly amount of 2.5 ounces) of medical cannabis. Sixty-eight (20.2%) respondents correctly identified all three approved conditions and all other incorrect conditions. Sixty-five (19.40%) respondents correctly identified all roles of dispensary pharmacists. Majority of respondents, 243 (72.5%), expressed their concern about federal laws regarding cannabis. A total of 98 (29.3%) respondents thought that they were knowledgeable enough about the side effects of medical cannabis to provide appropriate counseling to patients. Overall, the results of our survey found that Connecticut licensed pharmacists had lack of complete and accurate knowledge regarding the state's MCP. As more states legalize medical cannabis, it will be imperative that education of pharmacists and other health care professionals about the MCP and the clinical use of cannabis occur.
在过去的几年中,全国范围内对医用大麻(通常称为医用大麻)研究和兴趣的增长。医用大麻已成为治疗疾病的一种选择,例如癫痫,艾滋病相关消瘦综合征和创伤后应激障碍,而传统药物无效。目的是确定康涅狄格州药剂师对康涅狄格州医用大麻计划(MCP)的知识不足,以及 MCP 对康涅狄格州药房实践的影响以及康涅狄格州药剂师对医用大麻使用的关注。通过在线平台 Google 表单进行了为期 2 个月的横断面调查(2017 年 10 月 15 日至 2017 年 12 月 15 日)。将包含调查链接的电子邮件发送给可从康涅狄格州委员会药学数据库(=6182)获得电子邮件地址的所有药剂师。在有可用电子邮件地址的人中,只有 5653 名药剂师收到了电子邮件。其他人在收到我们的电子邮件后被拒绝。我们的调查包括与药剂师人口统计学信息,知识评估,对药剂师实践的影响以及医用大麻引起的关注相关的 16 个项目。只有 51 名(15.2%)受访者认为康涅狄格州 MCP 将影响他们的实践。只有 39 名(11.6%)受访者选择了患者注册的两个正确要求,并正确识别了错误的选择。只有 81 名(24.2%)受访者确定了医用大麻的正确批准剂量(每月最高允许 2.5 盎司)。68 名(20.2%)受访者正确识别了所有三种批准的条件和所有其他不正确的条件。65 名(19.40%)受访者正确识别了所有药房药剂师的三个角色。大多数受访者(243 名,占 72.5%)对与大麻有关的联邦法律表示担忧。共有 98 名(29.3%)受访者认为他们对医用大麻的副作用有足够的了解,可以向患者提供适当的咨询。总的来说,我们的调查结果发现,康涅狄格州持牌药剂师对该州的 MCP 缺乏完整和准确的了解。随着越来越多的州使医用大麻合法化,对药剂师和其他医疗保健专业人员进行有关 MCP 和大麻临床使用的教育将至关重要。