• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

军事卫生系统中护士助产士与医生接生结局的比较。

Comparison of Nurse-Midwife and Physician Birth Outcomes in the Military Health System.

作者信息

Hamlin Lynette, Grunwald Lindsay, Sturdivant Rodney X, Koehlmoos Tracey P

机构信息

Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.

出版信息

Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2021 May;22(2):105-113. doi: 10.1177/1527154421994071. Epub 2021 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1177/1527154421994071
PMID:33615908
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of women cared for by Certified Nurse-Midwives (CNMs) versus physicians in the Military Health System (MHS) and compare birth outcomes between provider types. The MHS is one of America's largest and most complex health care systems. Using the Military Health System Data Repository, this retrospective study examined TRICARE beneficiaries who gave birth during 2012-2014. Analysis included frequency of patients by perinatal services, descriptive statistics, and logistic regression analysis by provider type. To account for differences in patient and pregnancy risk, odds ratios were calculated for both high-risk and general risk population. There were 136,848 births from 2012 to 2014, and 30.8% were delivered by CNMs. Low-risk women whose births were attended by CNMs had lower odds of a cesarean birth, /augmentation of labor, complications of birth, postpartum hemorrhage, endometritis, and preterm birth and higher odds of a vaginal birth, vaginal birth after cesarean, and breastfeeding than women whose births were attended by physicians. These results have implications for the composition of the women's health workforce. In the MHS, where CNMs work to the fullest scope of their authority, CNMs attended almost 4 times births than our national average. An example to other U.S. systems and high-income countries, this study adds to the growing body of evidence demonstrating that when CNMs practice to the fullest extent of their education, they provide quality health outcomes to more women.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定在军事卫生系统(MHS)中由认证助产士(CNM)护理的女性与由医生护理的女性的社会经济和人口特征,并比较不同提供者类型之间的分娩结局。MHS是美国最大且最复杂的医疗保健系统之一。利用军事卫生系统数据存储库,这项回顾性研究调查了2012 - 2014年期间分娩的TRICARE受益人。分析包括围产期服务的患者频率、描述性统计以及按提供者类型进行的逻辑回归分析。为了考虑患者和妊娠风险的差异,计算了高危和一般风险人群的比值比。2012年至2014年共有136,848例分娩,其中30.8%由CNM接生。与由医生接生的女性相比,由CNM接生的低风险女性剖宫产、引产、分娩并发症、产后出血、子宫内膜炎和早产的几率更低,而阴道分娩、剖宫产术后阴道分娩和母乳喂养的几率更高。这些结果对女性健康劳动力的构成具有启示意义。在MHS中,CNM在其最大权限范围内工作,CNM接生的分娩数量几乎是我国平均水平的4倍。作为美国其他系统和高收入国家的一个范例,本研究增加了越来越多的证据,表明当CNM充分发挥其教育水平时,她们能为更多女性提供优质的健康结局。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Nurse-Midwife and Physician Birth Outcomes in the Military Health System.军事卫生系统中护士助产士与医生接生结局的比较。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2021 May;22(2):105-113. doi: 10.1177/1527154421994071. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
2
Birth Outcomes of Women Using a Midwife versus Women Using a Physician for Prenatal Care.产妇使用助产士和使用医师进行产前护理的分娩结果比较。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jul;63(4):399-409. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12750. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
3
Midwife-attended births in the United States, 1990-2012: results from revised birth certificate data.1990 - 2012年美国助产士接生情况:出生证明数据修订结果
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Jan-Feb;60(1):10-5. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12287.
4
Intrapartum Care and Experiences of Women with Midwives Versus Obstetricians in the Listening to Mothers in California Survey.产妇在加利福尼亚倾听母亲调查中与助产士和产科医生的分娩护理和体验。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):45-55. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13027. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
5
Outcomes of planned home births attended by certified nurse-midwives in southeastern Pennsylvania, 1983-2008.宾夕法尼亚州东南部由认证的注册护士助产士于 1983-2008 年进行的计划家庭分娩的结果。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;58(2):145-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00217.x. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
6
State Scope of Practice Laws, Nurse-Midwifery Workforce, and Childbirth Procedures and Outcomes.州执业范围法律、助产士劳动力以及分娩程序与结果
Womens Health Issues. 2016 May-Jun;26(3):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
7
Accuracy of birth certificate and hospital discharge data: a certified nurse-midwife and physician comparison.出生证明与医院出院数据的准确性:认证护士助产士与医生的比较
Matern Child Health J. 2007 Nov;11(6):540-8. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0178-3. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
8
Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.独立助产士在分娩中心和家中分娩的结局:日本的一项回顾性队列研究。
Midwifery. 2013 Aug;29(8):965-72. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
9
Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the type of birth attendant.美国的新生儿死亡率与出生地点(医院与家庭)有关,而与分娩助手的类型无关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):254.e1-254.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.045. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
10
A Comparative Workforce Study of Midwives Practicing in the State of Texas.德克萨斯州执业助产士的劳动力比较研究。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Nov;63(6):682-692. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12739. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the influence of medical staffing and birth volume on observed-to-expected cesarean deliveries: a panel data analysis of integrated obstetric and gynecological departments in Germany.探讨医疗人员配备和分娩量对观察到的与预期剖宫产率的影响:德国妇产科综合科室的面板数据分析
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Jan 21. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01749-0.
2
CPD providers can positively impact practice by better understanding how APNs are educated, licenced, and certified.继续职业发展(CPD)提供者可以通过更好地了解高级实践护士(APN)是如何接受教育、获得执照和认证的,从而对实践产生积极影响。
J CME. 2023 Jan 11;12(1):2160531. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2022.2160531. eCollection 2023.