• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

犯罪成因需求与亲密伴侣暴力:与累犯的关联及对治疗的启示。

Criminogenic needs and intimate partner violence: Association with recidivism and implications for treatment.

机构信息

Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, University of Toronto.

Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Niagara University.

出版信息

Psychol Serv. 2021 Nov;18(4):566-573. doi: 10.1037/ser0000450. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1037/ser0000450
PMID:33617271
Abstract

The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) principles of effective correctional service that are well supported in the general offending literature have less often been applied to the assessment and treatment of intimate partner violence (IPV). Well validated IPV risk assessment tools are now widely available, and IPV treatment programs that match treatment intensity to assessed risk have shown promising pre-to-post treatment effects. The present study builds on the study of RNR principles in IPV by exploring criminogenic needs and their relation to recidivism and to recently proposed treatment intensity categories derived from an IPV risk assessment tool. We reanalyzed data from 1,421 men with a police report of IPV in the original Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA) dataset, to explore the prevalence of antisocial personality traits, procriminal attitudes, substance use, poor relationships, and work/school problems and their relation to IPV recidivism and ODARA-based treatment intensity categories. Needs were present in 17% (procriminal attitudes) to 42% (substance use) of men. All needs except poor relationships were positively related to IPV recidivism; in logistic regression analyses, antisocial personality traits (OR = 1.80) and poor relationships (OR = 0.61) incrementally predicted IPV recidivism over the ODARA (OR = 1.40). Men placed in higher treatment intensity categories based on the risk assessment score had more criminogenic treatment needs. Findings support using the ODARA to select individuals for the most intensive IPV treatment, and suggest that assessing and treating criminogenic needs may improve IPV treatment outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

有效的矫正服务的风险-需求-反应性 (RNR) 原则在一般犯罪文献中得到了很好的支持,但在亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 的评估和治疗中应用较少。现在有广泛可用的经过充分验证的 IPV 风险评估工具,并且根据评估风险匹配治疗强度的 IPV 治疗方案显示出有希望的治疗前后效果。本研究通过探索犯罪倾向需求及其与累犯的关系以及最近从 IPV 风险评估工具中提出的治疗强度类别,在 IPV 中的 RNR 原则研究的基础上进一步探讨。我们重新分析了原始安大略省家庭暴力风险评估 (ODARA) 数据集中 1421 名有警方报告的 IPV 男性的数据,以探讨反社会人格特质、亲犯罪态度、物质使用、不良关系和工作/学校问题的普遍性,以及它们与 IPV 累犯和基于 ODARA 的治疗强度类别的关系。在 17%(亲犯罪态度)到 42%(物质使用)的男性中存在需求。除了不良关系外,所有需求都与 IPV 累犯呈正相关;在逻辑回归分析中,反社会人格特质(OR = 1.80)和不良关系(OR = 0.61)在 ODARA (OR = 1.40)的基础上逐次预测 IPV 累犯。根据风险评估分数被分配到更高治疗强度类别的男性有更多的犯罪倾向治疗需求。研究结果支持使用 ODARA 为最严重的 IPV 治疗选择个体,并表明评估和治疗犯罪倾向需求可能会改善 IPV 治疗结果。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Criminogenic needs and intimate partner violence: Association with recidivism and implications for treatment.犯罪成因需求与亲密伴侣暴力:与累犯的关联及对治疗的启示。
Psychol Serv. 2021 Nov;18(4):566-573. doi: 10.1037/ser0000450. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
2
Incremental prediction of intimate partner violence: An examination of three risk measures.逐步预测亲密伴侣暴力:三种风险措施的检验。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;41(5):440-453. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000251. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
3
Using a General Case Management Tool With Partner-violent Men on Community Supervision in Iowa.在爱荷华州,使用一般个案管理工具对社区监管中的伴侣暴力男性。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jun;37(11-12):NP8844-NP8866. doi: 10.1177/0886260520978189. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
4
The Criminogenic and Noncriminogenic Treatment Needs of Intimate Partner Violence Offenders.亲密伴侣暴力犯罪者的犯罪ogenic和非犯罪ogenic治疗需求 。 注:这里“Criminogenic”可能是生造词或拼写有误,推测正确的可能是“Criminogenic”,意为“产生犯罪的” ,但按照要求未做修改直接翻译了。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Aug;62(11):3247-3259. doi: 10.1177/0306624X17740015. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
5
Disentangling the relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder, criminogenic risk, and criminal history among veterans.解析创伤后应激障碍、犯罪风险和退伍军人犯罪史之间的关系。
Law Hum Behav. 2023 Oct;47(5):579-590. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000542.
6
Empathy Impairments in Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators With Antisocial and Borderline Traits: A Key Factor in the Risk of Recidivism.具有反社会和边缘性特质的亲密伴侣暴力施暴者的共情缺陷:再犯风险的关键因素
Violence Vict. 2016;31(2):347-60. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00149. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
7
Criminogenic or criminalized? Testing an assumption for expanding criminogenic risk assessment.致罪因素还是犯罪化?检验扩展致罪风险评估的假设。
Law Hum Behav. 2019 Oct;43(5):477-490. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000347. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
8
Effectiveness of the IDAP Treatment Program for Male Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: A Controlled Study of Criminal Recidivism.IDAP治疗方案对亲密伴侣暴力男性施暴者的有效性:一项关于再次犯罪的对照研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Apr;32(7):1027-1043. doi: 10.1177/0886260515586377. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
9
Disentangling the risk assessment and intimate partner violence relation: Estimating mediating and moderating effects.厘清风险评估与亲密伴侣暴力关系:中介和调节效应的估计。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Aug;41(4):344-353. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000249. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
10
The 2D:4D Ratio as a Predictor of the Risk of Recidivism after Court-mandated Intervention Program for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators.二维食指与无名指长度比例作为亲密伴侣暴力施暴者法庭强制干预项目后再犯风险的预测指标
J Forensic Sci. 2017 May;62(3):705-709. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13315. Epub 2016 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Intimate Partner Violence Research in Canada.加拿大亲密伴侣暴力研究的范围综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2025 Jan;26(1):73-85. doi: 10.1177/15248380241275979. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
2
Integrated Motivational Strategies for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators with Substance Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial.综合动机策略对有药物使用的亲密伴侣暴力实施者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Psychosoc Interv. 2024 Sep 2;33(3):187-200. doi: 10.5093/pi2024a13. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
The Effectiveness of Intervention Programs for Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence with Substance Abuse and/or Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review.
干预项目对有药物滥用和/或精神障碍的亲密伴侣暴力实施者的有效性:系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Dec;25(5):4188-4203. doi: 10.1177/15248380241270063. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
4
The Uptake and Measurement of Alternative Approaches to Domestic Violence Intervention Programs: A Scoping Review.采用和衡量家庭暴力干预方案的替代方法:范围综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Oct;25(4):3269-3284. doi: 10.1177/15248380241244398. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
5
Integrating 'Principles of Effective Intervention' into Domestic Violence Intervention Programs: New Opportunities for Change and Collaboration.将“有效干预原则”融入家庭暴力干预项目:变革与合作的新机遇。
Am J Crim Justice. 2021;46(4):609-625. doi: 10.1007/s12103-021-09627-8. Epub 2021 Jul 12.