Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
J Urol. 2021 Jul;206(1):104-108. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001693. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate has proven to be efficacious and safe for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. New laser technologies, such as the MOSES™ pulse laser system, improve energy delivery and may improve operative times. We sought to prospectively evaluate holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using MOSES technology in a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
This is a single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using MOSES technology to holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion. The study was powered to evaluate for a difference in operative time. Secondary end points included enucleation, morcellation, and hemostasis times, as well as blood loss, functional outcomes and complications 6 weeks postoperatively.
A total of 60 patients were analyzed without difference in preoperative characteristics in either group (holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using MOSES technology: 30/60, 50%, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: 30/60, 50%). Shorter total operative time was seen in the holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using MOSES technology group compared to the holmium laser enucleation of the prostate group (mean: 101 vs. 126 minutes, p <0.01). This difference remained significant on multiple linear regression. Additionally, the holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using MOSES technology group had shorter enucleation times (mean: 68 vs. 80 minutes, p=0.03), hemostasis time (mean: 18 vs. 29 minutes, p <0.01), and less blood loss (mean: -6.3 vs. -9.0%, p=0.03), measured by a smaller change in hematocrit postoperatively, compared to the traditional holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. There was no difference in functional or safety outcomes at followup.
We report the results of a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using MOSES technology to traditional holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. MOSES technology resulted in an improvement in operative time and a reduction in blood loss with comparable functional outcomes and complications compared to traditional holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.
钬激光前列腺剜除术已被证明对治疗良性前列腺增生症是有效且安全的。新的激光技术,如 MOSES™脉冲激光系统,改善了能量传递,可能会缩短手术时间。我们旨在前瞻性地评估使用 MOSES 技术的钬激光前列腺剜除术在一项双盲随机对照试验中的效果。
这是一项单中心前瞻性双盲随机对照试验,比较了使用 MOSES 技术的钬激光前列腺剜除术与传统的钬激光前列腺剜除术。患者以 1:1 的比例随机分组。该研究旨在评估手术时间的差异。次要终点包括剜除、切碎和止血时间,以及术后 6 周的出血量、功能结果和并发症。
在两组中,术前特征均无差异(使用 MOSES 技术的钬激光前列腺剜除术:30/60,50%;传统的钬激光前列腺剜除术:30/60,50%)。与传统的钬激光前列腺剜除术相比,使用 MOSES 技术的钬激光前列腺剜除术的总手术时间更短(平均:101 分钟 vs. 126 分钟,p <0.01)。这一差异在多元线性回归中仍然显著。此外,与传统的钬激光前列腺剜除术相比,使用 MOSES 技术的钬激光前列腺剜除术的剜除时间更短(平均:68 分钟 vs. 80 分钟,p=0.03)、止血时间更短(平均:18 分钟 vs. 29 分钟,p <0.01)、出血量更少(平均:-6.3% vs. -9.0%,p=0.03,通过术后血细胞比容的变化来衡量)。在随访时,功能和安全性结果没有差异。
我们报告了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验的结果,比较了使用 MOSES 技术的钬激光前列腺剜除术与传统的钬激光前列腺剜除术。与传统的钬激光前列腺剜除术相比,MOSES 技术不仅缩短了手术时间,减少了出血量,而且在功能结果和并发症方面没有差异。