Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Urology. 2020 Feb;136:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.029. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
To compare outcomes for patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostate hyperplasia using 3 different laser fibers and 2 different laser energy modes.
This is a review of a clinic registry of men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostate hyperplasia who underwent HoLEP between August 2018 and January 2019. Patients were assigned to group 1 (50 patients), group 2 (50 patients), and group 3 (50 patients) based on the HoLEP being completed with either a Slimline 550µm, Slimline 1000µm, or MOSES 550 µm laser, respectively. The groups were compared using SSPS for ANOVA comparison of means and multivariate logistic regression.
Ten patients who underwent concomitant stone surgery (2 PCNL, 8 ureteroscopy , 3 bilateral cases) and 11 patients had bladder stones removed; ancillary procedures did not significantly differ between groups(P = .2). Prostate enucleation times differed significantly (22.5 + 7.3, 16.4 + 6.9, 18.1 + 8.6 minutes P ≤.001) between groups. However, statistical significance was lost once enucleation time was indexed against enucleated tissue weight. Time to achieve hemostasis (minutes) was statistically different between groups (10.6 + 6.1, 7.7 + 5.2, 6.3 + 4.8 P <.001). This difference in hemostatic time was maintained on multilogistic regression demonstrating that MOSES laser enucleation was associated with a 3.9-minute decrease time to achieve hemostasis after enucleation compared to Slimline 550 HoLEP (P <.001).
Our findings suggest that modulated pulsed laser energy can improve hemostasis during the enucleation phase of a HoLEP resulting in shorter Operating Room times.
比较使用 3 种不同激光光纤和 2 种不同激光能量模式对良性前列腺增生引起的下尿路症状行钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)的患者的治疗效果。
这是一项对 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 1 月期间行 HoLEP 治疗的良性前列腺增生引起的下尿路症状患者的临床登记数据的回顾性研究。根据 HoLEP 手术中使用的激光光纤的不同(Slimline 550μm、Slimline 1000μm 或 MOSES 550μm)将患者分为 1 组(50 例)、2 组(50 例)和 3 组(50 例)。采用 SPSS 软件进行方差分析比较均值和多变量逻辑回归分析对各组进行比较。
10 例患者(2 例行 PCNL、8 例行输尿管镜检查、3 例为双侧手术)同时进行了结石手术,11 例患者行膀胱结石取出术,各组之间的辅助手术无显著差异(P=0.2)。前列腺剜除时间有显著差异(22.5+7.3、16.4+6.9、18.1+8.6 分钟,P≤0.001),但当将剜除时间与剜除组织重量进行指数化比较时,统计学意义消失。止血时间(分钟)在组间有统计学差异(10.6+6.1、7.7+5.2、6.3+4.8 分钟,P<0.001)。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,MOSES 激光前列腺剜除术与 Slimline 550 HoLEP 相比,在前列腺剜除后止血时间减少 3.9 分钟,这一差异在止血时间上仍然存在(P<0.001)。
我们的研究结果表明,调制脉冲激光能量可改善 HoLEP 前列腺剜除术中的止血效果,从而缩短手术时间。