Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Sep;74(3):729-737. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.01.063. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
The current guidelines recommend elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair at 5.5 cm for men and 5.0 cm for women. However, rupture can occur in patients with an aneurysm smaller than these size thresholds. In the present study, we investigated the proportion of AAAs that rupture at sizes less than elective operative thresholds and compared the outcomes of repair with those of aneurysms that had ruptured at a larger size. Our hypothesis was that the rupture of small AAAs carries mortality similar to that of rupture at larger sizes.
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular files for open AAA repair and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) were reviewed for all cases of ruptured AAAs (rAAAs) from 2011 to 2018. The patients were divided into two groups: those with small AAAs that had ruptured at a size less than the current size guidelines for elective repair and those with large AAAs that had ruptured at a size that had met the criteria for elective repair. Univariate analyses were conducted to compare the comorbidities and perioperative outcomes of infrarenal rAAA repair between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the differences in mortality between small and large rAAAs after controlling for confounding variables.
Of the 1612 rAAA repairs, 167 (10.4%) were small rAAAs. The proportion of small rAAAs did not significantly change during the study period (P = .15). The large rAAA group was more likely to have juxtarenal or suprarenal aneurysms compared with the small rAAA group (27% vs 16%; P = .001). A comparison of infrarenal rAAAs only demonstrated that the mean small rAAA (n = 141) diameter was 4.1 cm in the women and 4.5 cm in the men compared with the large rAAAs (n = 1051), with a mean diameter of 7.1 cm in women and 8.3 cm in men (P < .01 for the women; P < .01 for the men). The patients in the small rAAA group had had a significantly lower body mass index but were more likely to be African American and to have hypertension. The small rAAA group was more likely to present without hypotension and to have undergone EVAR. The repair of small rAAAs was associated with lower bleeding and mortality and a shorter mean operative time but with more readmissions. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that size was not associated with outcome after adjusting for other variables.
Of all AAA repairs classified as treating rupture, 10% were for patients with small AAAs. Patients with small rAAA were less likely to present with hypotension and were more likely to have undergone EVAR. Further research into sac morphology and more sensitive imaging modalities might help identify small rAAAs at high risk of rupture that would benefit from elective repair.
目前的指南建议男性患者的腹主动脉瘤(AAA)择期修复直径应大于 5.5 厘米,女性患者则应大于 5.0 厘米。然而,在这些大小阈值以下的患者中,动脉瘤仍有可能破裂。本研究旨在探讨小于择期手术阈值的 AAA 破裂的比例,并比较其修复结果与更大尺寸破裂的动脉瘤的修复结果。我们的假设是,小的 AAA 破裂的死亡率与较大尺寸破裂的死亡率相似。
回顾了 2011 年至 2018 年间接受开放腹主动脉瘤修复和血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)的美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划的目标血管文件,所有破裂的腹主动脉瘤(rAAA)病例均纳入研究。患者分为两组:一组为破裂时直径小于当前择期修复指南的小 AAA,另一组为破裂时直径符合择期修复标准的大 AAA。采用单变量分析比较两组肾下 rAAA 修复的合并症和围手术期结果。采用多变量逻辑回归分析控制混杂变量后,比较小 rAAA 和大 rAAA 之间的死亡率差异。
在 1612 例 rAAA 修复中,有 167 例(10.4%)为小 rAAA。研究期间,小 rAAA 的比例没有显著变化(P=.15)。与小 rAAA 组相比,大 rAAA 组更有可能有肾周或肾上动脉瘤(27%比 16%;P=.001)。仅对肾下 rAAA 进行比较,结果表明,女性小 rAAA(n=141)的平均直径为 4.1 厘米,男性为 4.5 厘米,而大 rAAA(n=1051)的平均直径为 7.1 厘米,女性为 8.3 厘米,男性为 8.3 厘米(女性 P<.01;男性 P<.01)。小 rAAA 组患者的体重指数明显较低,但更可能是非洲裔美国人,且患有高血压。小 rAAA 组更有可能在没有低血压的情况下出现,并接受 EVAR 治疗。小 rAAA 的修复与较低的出血和死亡率以及较短的平均手术时间相关,但再入院率较高。多变量回归分析表明,在调整其他变量后,大小与结果无关。
在所有分类为治疗破裂的 AAA 修复中,有 10%是为小 AAA 患者进行的。小 rAAA 患者更不可能出现低血压,更有可能接受 EVAR 治疗。进一步研究瘤囊形态和更敏感的成像方式可能有助于识别破裂风险较高的小 rAAA,并从中受益于择期修复。