• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用 qPCR 和 dPCR 方法对升麻属植物(黑升麻)及其部分潜在掺伪品进行定量分析。

Quantification of Actaea racemosa L. (black cohosh) from some of its potential adulterants using qPCR and dPCR methods.

机构信息

NHP Research Alliance, College of Biological Sciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 22;11(1):4331. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80465-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-80465-0
PMID:33619286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7900226/
Abstract

The demand for popular natural health products (NHPs) such as Black Cohosh is increasing considerably, which in turn challenges quality assurance (QA) throughout the supply chain. To detect and quantify the target species present in a given NHP, DNA-based molecular techniques such as Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) and digital PCR (dPCR) are standard tools in the food and pathogen testing industries. There is a gap in the literature concerning validated quantitative PCR methods for botanicals that can be utilized for QA and good manufacturing practices. The objective of this study is to develop an efficient quantification method using qPCR and dPCR techniques for the detection and quantification of Actaea racemosa (Black cohosh) NHPs from its potential adulterants. These developed methods are validated for applicability on commercial NHPs. Species-specific hydrolysis probe assays were designed to analyze the black cohosh NHPs using qPCR and dPCR techniques. The results confirmed that the developed qPCR and dPCR methods are highly precise for identifying and quantifying black cohosh NHPs, indicating their potential applicability in future routine industrial and laboratory testing. This enables a single qPCR test to determine not only the presence of a specific botanical, but also the amount when mixed with an adulterant.

摘要

对黑升麻等热门天然保健品(NHPs)的需求正在大幅增加,这反过来又对整个供应链的质量保证(QA)提出了挑战。为了检测和量化给定 NHP 中存在的目标物种,基于 DNA 的分子技术,如实时定量 PCR(qPCR)和数字 PCR(dPCR),是食品和病原体检测行业的标准工具。在关于可用于 QA 和良好生产规范的植物定量 PCR 方法的文献中存在空白。本研究的目的是开发一种使用 qPCR 和 dPCR 技术的高效定量方法,用于从潜在掺杂物中检测和定量升麻属植物(黑升麻)NHP。这些开发的方法经过验证可适用于商业 NHP。设计了物种特异性水解探针检测法,以便使用 qPCR 和 dPCR 技术分析黑升麻 NHP。结果证实,开发的 qPCR 和 dPCR 方法非常精确,可用于识别和定量黑升麻 NHP,表明它们在未来的常规工业和实验室测试中具有潜在适用性。这使得单次 qPCR 测试不仅可以确定特定植物的存在,还可以确定与掺杂物混合时的数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab1/7900226/d6494d829818/41598_2020_80465_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab1/7900226/95c6f2f43260/41598_2020_80465_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab1/7900226/d6494d829818/41598_2020_80465_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab1/7900226/95c6f2f43260/41598_2020_80465_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab1/7900226/d6494d829818/41598_2020_80465_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantification of Actaea racemosa L. (black cohosh) from some of its potential adulterants using qPCR and dPCR methods.采用 qPCR 和 dPCR 方法对升麻属植物(黑升麻)及其部分潜在掺伪品进行定量分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 22;11(1):4331. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80465-0.
2
Validation and Optimization of qPCR Method for Identification of Actaea racemosa (Black Cohosh) NHPs.美洲升麻(黑升麻) NHPs 的 qPCR 鉴定方法的验证和优化。
J AOAC Int. 2021 Jun 12;104(3):836-846. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsaa167.
3
Phytochemical fingerprinting to thwart black cohosh adulteration: a 15 Actaea species analysis.植物化学指纹图谱技术防止黑升麻掺假:15 种类叶升麻属植物分析。
Phytochem Anal. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(4):339-51. doi: 10.1002/pca.1285. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
4
Ethnobotany, Phytochemistry, Traditional and Modern Uses of Actaea racemosa L. (Black cohosh): A Review.总状升麻(黑升麻)的民族植物学、植物化学、传统与现代用途综述
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1308:403-449. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-64872-5_24.
5
Detection of Actaea racemosa adulteration by thin-layer chromatography and combined thin-layer chromatography-bioluminescence.通过薄层色谱法以及薄层色谱 - 生物发光联用技术检测黑升麻掺假情况。
J AOAC Int. 2008 Mar-Apr;91(2):268-75.
6
Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for Actaea racemosa (black cohosh, Ranunculaceae).开发和表征美洲升麻(黑升麻,毛茛科)的微卫星标记。
Am J Bot. 2012 Jul;99(7):e274-6. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1100577. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
7
Economical, Plain, and Rapid Authentication of Actaea racemosa L. (syn. Cimicifuga racemosa, Black Cohosh) Herbal Raw Material by Resilient RP-PDA-HPLC and Chemometric Analysis.通过弹性RP-PDA-HPLC和化学计量学分析对总状升麻(同义词:黑升麻)草药原料进行经济、简便且快速的鉴定
Phytochem Anal. 2016 Nov;27(6):318-325. doi: 10.1002/pca.2622. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
8
Evaluation of the botanical origin of black cohosh products by genetic and chemical analyses.通过遗传和化学分析评估黑升麻产品的植物来源。
Biol Pharm Bull. 2014;37(3):454-60. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b13-00844.
9
Hyperspectral Imaging and Support Vector Machine: A Powerful Combination to Differentiate Black Cohosh (Actaea racemosa) from Other Cohosh Species.高光谱成像与支持向量机:区分黑升麻(总状升麻)与其他升麻属物种的强大组合。
Planta Med. 2018 Apr;84(6-07):407-419. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119887. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
10
Evaluation of the botanical authenticity and phytochemical profile of black cohosh products by high-performance liquid chromatography with selected ion monitoring liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.采用高效液相色谱-选择离子监测液相色谱-质谱联用技术对黑升麻产品的植物来源真实性和植物化学特征进行评估。
J Agric Food Chem. 2006 May 3;54(9):3242-53. doi: 10.1021/jf0606149.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies for molecular authentication of herbal products: from experimental design to data analysis.草药产品分子鉴定策略:从实验设计到数据分析
Chin Med. 2022 Mar 22;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13020-022-00590-y.
2
Utilizing Big Data to Identify Tiny Toxic Components: .利用大数据识别微小有毒成分:
Foods. 2021 Aug 3;10(8):1794. doi: 10.3390/foods10081794.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation and Optimization of qPCR Method for Identification of Actaea racemosa (Black Cohosh) NHPs.美洲升麻(黑升麻) NHPs 的 qPCR 鉴定方法的验证和优化。
J AOAC Int. 2021 Jun 12;104(3):836-846. doi: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsaa167.
2
Exploring DNA quantity and quality from raw materials to botanical extracts.探索从原材料到植物提取物的DNA数量和质量。
Heliyon. 2019 Jun 15;5(6):e01935. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01935. eCollection 2019 Jun.
3
DNA Quality and Quantity Analysis of Through Processing from Fresh Leaves to a Green Tea Extract.
从新鲜叶片加工成绿茶提取物过程中的DNA质量和数量分析。
J AOAC Int. 2019 Nov 1;102(6):1798-1807. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.18-0318. Epub 2019 May 21.
4
Recommendations for Validation of Real-Time PCR Methods for Molecular Diagnostic Identification of Botanicals.用于植物分子诊断鉴定的实时PCR方法验证建议
J AOAC Int. 2019 Nov 1;102(6):1767-1773. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.18-0321. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
5
The Promise of Molecular and Genomic Techniques for Biodiversity Research and DNA Barcoding of the Arabian Peninsula Flora.分子和基因组技术在阿拉伯半岛植物区系生物多样性研究及DNA条形码分析中的应用前景
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jan 21;9:1929. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01929. eCollection 2018.
6
Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assays integrated with an internal control for quantification of bovine, porcine, chicken and turkey species in food and feed.与内部对照相结合的液滴数字聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)检测法,用于食品和饲料中牛、猪、鸡和火鸡物种的定量分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182872. eCollection 2017.
7
Comparison of droplet digital PCR and quantitative real-time PCR in -based methanogen community analysis.基于液滴数字PCR和定量实时PCR的产甲烷菌群落分析比较
Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2014 Jul 5;4:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2014.06.010. eCollection 2014 Dec.
8
A digital PCR method for identifying and quantifying adulteration of meat species in raw and processed food.一种用于识别和定量生熟食品中肉类品种掺假的数字PCR方法。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 20;12(3):e0173567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173567. eCollection 2017.
9
Authentication of Herbal Supplements Using Next-Generation Sequencing.使用下一代测序技术对草药补充剂进行鉴定
PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156426. eCollection 2016.
10
Comparison of Flow Injection MS, NMR, and DNA Sequencing: Methods for Identification and Authentication of Black Cohosh (Actaea racemosa).流动注射质谱、核磁共振和DNA测序的比较:黑升麻(Actaea racemosa)的鉴定与认证方法
Planta Med. 2016 Feb;82(3):250-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558113. Epub 2015 Dec 21.