Delaunois Annie, Abernathy Matthew, Anderson Warren D, Beattie Kylie A, Chaudhary Khuram W, Coulot Julie, Gryshkova Vitalina, Hebeisen Simon, Holbrook Mark, Kramer James, Kuryshev Yuri, Leishman Derek, Lushbough Isabel, Passini Elisa, Redfern Will S, Rodriguez Blanca, Rossman Eric I, Trovato Cristian, Wu Caiyun, Valentin Jean-Pierre
UCB Biopharma SRL, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.
Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 May;14(3):1133-1146. doi: 10.1111/cts.13011. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
We applied a set of in silico and in vitro assays, compliant with the Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm, to assess the risk of chloroquine (CLQ) or hydroxychloroquine (OH-CLQ)-mediated QT prolongation and Torsades de Pointes (TdP), alone and combined with erythromycin (ERT) and azithromycin (AZI), drugs repurposed during the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Each drug or drug combination was tested in patch clamp assays on seven cardiac ion channels, in in silico models of human ventricular electrophysiology (Virtual Assay) using control (healthy) or high-risk cell populations, and in human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes. In each assay, concentration-response curves encompassing and exceeding therapeutic free plasma levels were generated. Both CLQ and OH-CLQ showed blocking activity against some potassium, sodium, and calcium currents. CLQ and OH-CLQ inhibited I (half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC ]: 1 µM and 3-7 µM, respectively) and I currents (IC : 5 and 44 µM, respectively). When combining OH-CLQ with AZI, no synergistic effects were observed. The two macrolides had no or very weak effects on the ion currents (IC > 300-1000 µM). Using Virtual Assay, both antimalarials affected several TdP indicators, CLQ being more potent than OH-CLQ. Effects were more pronounced in the high-risk cell population. In hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes, all drugs showed early after-depolarizations, except AZI. Combining CLQ or OH-CLQ with a macrolide did not aggravate their effects. In conclusion, our integrated nonclinical CiPA dataset confirmed that, at therapeutic plasma concentrations relevant for malaria or off-label use in COVID-19, CLQ and OH-CLQ use is associated with a proarrhythmia risk, which is higher in populations carrying predisposing factors but not worsened with macrolide combination.
我们应用了一组符合综合体外致心律失常试验(CiPA)范式的计算机模拟和体外试验,以评估氯喹(CLQ)或羟氯喹(OH-CLQ)介导的QT间期延长和尖端扭转型室速(TdP)的风险,单独使用以及与红霉素(ERT)和阿奇霉素(AZI)联合使用时的风险,这两种药物是在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)第一波疫情期间重新启用的药物。每种药物或药物组合在七种心脏离子通道的膜片钳试验中、在使用对照(健康)或高危细胞群体的人心室电生理计算机模拟模型(虚拟试验)中以及在人诱导多能干细胞(hiPSC)衍生的心肌细胞中进行了测试。在每项试验中,均生成了涵盖并超过治疗性游离血浆水平的浓度-反应曲线。CLQ和OH-CLQ均对某些钾、钠和钙电流表现出阻断活性。CLQ和OH-CLQ抑制I(半数最大抑制浓度[IC]:分别为1 μM和3 - 7 μM)和I电流(IC:分别为5和44 μM)。当将OH-CLQ与AZI联合使用时,未观察到协同效应。这两种大环内酯类药物对离子电流无影响或影响非常微弱(IC>300 - 1000 μM)。使用虚拟试验,这两种抗疟药均影响多个TdP指标,CLQ比OH-CLQ更有效。在高危细胞群体中,影响更为明显。在hiPSC衍生的心肌细胞中,除AZI外,所有药物均表现出早期后去极化。将CLQ或OH-CLQ与大环内酯类药物联合使用并未加重其作用。总之,我们整合的非临床CiPA数据集证实,在与疟疾治疗或COVID-19的非标签使用相关的治疗性血浆浓度下,使用CLQ和OH-CLQ与致心律失常风险相关,在携带易感因素的人群中风险更高,但与大环内酯类药物联合使用时风险并未恶化。