Suppr超能文献

氯喹和羟氯喹在高于临床治疗新冠病毒病所使用的浓度时会引发心律失常:一项模拟研究。

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine provoke arrhythmias at concentrations higher than those clinically used to treat COVID-19: A simulation study.

作者信息

Okada Jun-Ichi, Yoshinaga Takashi, Washio Takumi, Sawada Kohei, Sugiura Seiryo, Hisada Toshiaki

机构信息

Future Center Initiative, The University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan.

UT-Heart Inc, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2021 May;14(3):1092-1100. doi: 10.1111/cts.12976. Epub 2021 Feb 13.

Abstract

The risk of fatal arrhythmias is the major concern for using chloroquine (CQ) or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the reported number of life-threatening arrhythmic events or deaths is relatively small. The objective of this study was to assess the arrhythmogenic risk of these two drugs using a multiscale heart simulation, which allows testing even at high concentrations, including those that cause fatal arrhythmias. We measured the inhibitory action of CQ, HCQ, and HCQ with 30 μM azithromycin (AZ) on six ion currents (fast [INa] and late [INa,L] components of the sodium current, L-type calcium current [ICa,L], rapid [IKr/hERG], and slow [IKs] components of delayed rectifier potassium, and inward rectifier potassium [IK1]) over a wide range of concentrations using the automated patch-clamp system. Using the concentration-inhibition relationship that was thus obtained, we simulated the drug effects while increasing the concentration until the life-threatening arrhythmia, torsade de pointes (TdP), was observed. The obtained threshold concentrations for TdP were 12.5, 35, and 22.5 μM for CQ, HCQ, and HCQ with AZ, respectively. Adding therapeutic concentrations of mexiletine or verapamil successfully prevented the occurrence of TdP, and verapamil was more effective. CQ, HCQ, and HCQ with AZ thresholds for TdP were larger than both antiviral concentrations that were reported by in vitro experiments and free plasma concentrations that were attained by the clinically used dosage. The current simulation data provided a safety margin to the currently used clinical dose for CQ and HCQ/AZ. Study Highlights WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC? Despite the potent in vitro antiviral effect, clinical trials have failed to show the therapeutic effects of chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)/azithromycin (AZ) to treat coronavirus disease 2019. Torsadogenic potentials may limit the dosage of these drugs, but the reported incidence of fatal arrhythmias is rare. WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS? Our objective was to assess the arrhythmogenicity of CQ and HCQ/AZ over a wide range of drug concentrations using a multiscale heart simulation. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE? Our study showed that CQ and HCQ/AZ do not induce fatal arrhythmias even at concentrations much higher than in vitro antiviral half-maximal effective concentration (EC ) values at which QT prolongation exceeds 150 ms. We also found that estimated free plasma concentrations of CQ and HCQ/AZ achieved by currently used dosing protocols are lower than the antiviral EC for these drugs. HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE? Our simulation data provided a safety margin to the currently used clinical dose for CQ and HCQ/AZ.

摘要

使用氯喹(CQ)或羟氯喹(HCQ)治疗2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)时,致命性心律失常的风险是主要关注点,但报告的危及生命的心律失常事件或死亡数量相对较少。本研究的目的是使用多尺度心脏模拟评估这两种药物的致心律失常风险,该模拟甚至允许在高浓度下进行测试,包括那些会导致致命性心律失常的浓度。我们使用自动膜片钳系统,在很宽的浓度范围内测量了CQ、HCQ以及含30μM阿奇霉素(AZ)的HCQ对六种离子电流(钠电流的快速[INa]和晚期[INa,L]成分、L型钙电流[ICa,L]、延迟整流钾电流的快速[IKr/hERG]和慢速[IKs]成分以及内向整流钾电流[IK1])的抑制作用。利用由此获得的浓度-抑制关系,我们在增加浓度直至观察到危及生命的心律失常——尖端扭转型室速(TdP)的同时模拟了药物效应。对于CQ、HCQ以及含AZ的HCQ,观察到TdP的阈值浓度分别为12.5、35和22.5μM。添加治疗浓度的美西律或维拉帕米成功预防了TdP的发生,且维拉帕米更有效。CQ、HCQ以及含AZ的HCQ的TdP阈值高于体外实验报道的抗病毒浓度以及临床使用剂量所达到的游离血浆浓度。当前的模拟数据为CQ和HCQ/AZ的当前临床使用剂量提供了安全边际。研究亮点 关于该主题目前已知什么?尽管在体外具有强大的抗病毒作用,但临床试验未能显示氯喹(CQ)和羟氯喹(HCQ)/阿奇霉素(AZ)治疗2019冠状病毒病的治疗效果。致扭转型室速的可能性可能会限制这些药物的剂量,但报告的致命性心律失常发生率很低。 本研究解决了什么问题?我们的目标是使用多尺度心脏模拟在很宽的药物浓度范围内评估CQ和HCQ/AZ的致心律失常性。 本研究为我们的知识增添了什么?我们的研究表明,即使在浓度远高于体外抗病毒半数最大效应浓度(EC)值(此时QT间期延长超过150毫秒)时,CQ和HCQ/AZ也不会诱发致命性心律失常。我们还发现,目前使用的给药方案所达到的CQ和HCQ/AZ的估计游离血浆浓度低于这些药物的抗病毒EC值。 这可能如何改变临床药理学或转化科学?我们的模拟数据为CQ和HCQ和HCQ/AZ的当前临床使用剂量提供了安全边际。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a08/8212750/00cd1c4ec928/CTS-14-1092-g007.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验