Suppr超能文献

精神科住院护理中护理人员使用自伤行为戒除协议的体验的主题分析。

A thematic analysis of care provider experiences of using self-harm abstinence agreements in psychiatric inpatient care.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Clinical Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Psychiatry, Lund University, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2021 Jul;8(4):1660-1667. doi: 10.1002/nop2.795. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

Abstract

AIM

Traditional methods used when managing self-harm in a psychiatric inpatient setting tend to infringe on the autonomy of the individuals receiving treatment and are often experienced as practically and emotionally challenging by care providers. Therefore, we examined care providers' experiences of an alternative method negotiating self-harm abstinence agreements, which can be viewed as a form of positive risk taking.

DESIGN

A qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews with twelve mental health professionals.

METHODS

Thematic analysis of the interviews.

RESULTS

Five themes emerged; "No-harm agreements versus constant observation and coercion," "No-harm agreements to promote independence and collaboration," "No-harm agreements' effect on ward safety," "Ambiguity surrounding the no-harm agreements" and "Ethical complexities of the no-harm agreements." These indicated perceived positive effects on the therapeutic relationship, the individuals' autonomous functioning and the ward environment, but also practical and ethical difficulties.

摘要

目的

在精神科住院患者环境中管理自残时使用的传统方法往往侵犯了接受治疗者的自主权,并且经常被护理人员视为在实践和情感上具有挑战性。因此,我们研究了护理人员对替代方法协商自残戒除协议的体验,这可以被视为一种积极的冒险形式。

设计

使用半结构化访谈对 12 名心理健康专业人员进行定性研究。

方法

对访谈进行主题分析。

结果

出现了五个主题;“无伤害协议与持续观察和强制”、“无伤害协议促进独立性和合作”、“无伤害协议对病房安全的影响”、“无伤害协议的模糊性”和“无伤害协议的伦理复杂性”。这些主题表明,无伤害协议对治疗关系、个人的自主功能和病房环境有积极影响,但也存在实际和伦理上的困难。

相似文献

3
How people who self-harm negotiate the inpatient environment: the mental healthcare workers perspective.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Sep;24(7):480-490. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12384. Epub 2017 May 19.
4
Hospital staff experiences of their relationships with adults who self-harm: A meta-synthesis.
Psychol Psychother. 2017 Sep;90(3):480-501. doi: 10.1111/papt.12113. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
5
The psychiatric ward environment and nursing observations at night: A qualitative study.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Aug;27(4):342-351. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12583. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
8
Brief admission (BA) for patients with emotional instability and self-harm: nurses' perspectives - person-centred care in clinical practice.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2019 Dec;14(1):1667133. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2019.1667133.
9
Environmental changes to reduce self-harm on an adolescent inpatient psychiatric ward: an interrupted time series analysis.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;30(8):1173-1186. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01607-3. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

本文引用的文献

1
A palliative care approach in psychiatry: clinical implications.
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Apr 19;21(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00472-8.
3
Extreme challenges: psychiatric inpatients with severe self-harming behavior in Norway: a national screening investigation.
Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;72(8):605-612. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1511751. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
5
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):120-124. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
6
A self-destructive care: self-reports of people who experienced coercive measures and their suggestions for alternatives.
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Feb;36(2):96-103. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.951134.
7
Mental health nurses' experiences of caring for patients suffering from self-harm.
Nurs Res Pract. 2014;2014:905741. doi: 10.1155/2014/905741. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
8
Self-harm and attempted suicide within inpatient psychiatric services: a review of the literature.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Aug;21(4):301-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2011.00794.x. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
9
Attitudes and knowledge of clinical staff regarding people who self-harm: a systematic review.
J Affect Disord. 2012 Aug;139(3):205-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.08.024. Epub 2011 Sep 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验