Suppr超能文献

将广义类推法(GenRA)转变为定量预测:一项使用急性经口毒性数据的案例研究。

Transitioning the Generalised Read-Across approach (GenRA) to quantitative predictions: A case study using acute oral toxicity data.

作者信息

Helman George, Shah Imran, Patlewicz Grace

机构信息

Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.

National Center for Computational Toxicology (NCCT), Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park (RTP), NC 27711, USA.

出版信息

Comput Toxicol. 2019 Nov 1;12(November 2019). doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2019.100097.

Abstract

Read-across approaches continue to evolve as does their utility in the field of risk assessment. Previously we presented our generalised read-across (GenRA) approach (Shah et al., 2016), which utilises chemical descriptor and/or bioactivity data to make read-across predictions on the basis of the similarity weighted average of nearest neighbours. The current public version of GenRA predicts 574 apical outcomes as a binary call from repeat dose toxicity studies available in ToxRefDB (Helman et al., 2019). Here we investigated the application of GenRA to quantitative values, specifically using a large dataset of rat oral acute LD50 toxicity data (LD50 values for 7011 discrete chemicals) that had been collected under the auspices of the ICCVAM acute toxicity workgroup (ATWG). GenRA LD50 predictions were made based on the following criteria - chemicals were characterised by Morgan chemical fingerprints with a minimum similarity threshold of 0.5 and a maximum of 10 nearest neighbours over the entire dataset. An R value of 0.61 and RMSE of 0.58 was achieved based on these parameters. Monte Carlo cross validation was then used to estimate confidence in the R. Cross validated R values were found to fall in the range of 0.47 to 0.62. However, when evaluating GenRA locally to clusters of mechanistically or structurally-similar chemicals, average R values improved up to 0.91. GenRA can be extended to make reasonable quantitative predictions of acute oral rodent toxicity with improved performance exhibited for specific local domains.

摘要

类推法在不断发展,其在风险评估领域的效用也在不断变化。之前我们介绍了广义类推法(GenRA)(Shah等人,2016年),该方法利用化学描述符和/或生物活性数据,基于最近邻域的相似度加权平均值进行类推预测。GenRA当前的公开版本根据ToxRefDB(Helman等人,2019年)中重复剂量毒性研究的二元判定预测574种顶端效应。在此,我们研究了GenRA在定量值方面的应用,具体使用了在ICCVAM急性毒性工作组(ATWG)主持下收集的大鼠经口急性半数致死量(LD50)毒性数据的大型数据集(7011种离散化学品的LD50值)。GenRA的LD50预测基于以下标准——化学品通过摩根化学指纹进行表征,整个数据集中的最小相似度阈值为0.5,最多有10个最近邻域。基于这些参数,R值为0.61,均方根误差为0.58。然后使用蒙特卡洛交叉验证来估计对R值的置信度。交叉验证的R值在0.47至0.62范围内。然而,当在局部对机制或结构相似的化学品集群评估GenRA时,平均R值提高到了0.91。GenRA可以扩展,以对急性经口啮齿动物毒性进行合理的定量预测,并且在特定的局部领域表现出更好的性能。

相似文献

2
Quantitative prediction of repeat dose toxicity values using GenRA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Dec;109:104480. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104480. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
4
Generalized Read-Across (GenRA): A workflow implemented into the EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard.
ALTEX. 2019;36(3):462-465. doi: 10.14573/altex.1811292. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
7
Generalized Read-Across prediction using genra-py.
Bioinformatics. 2021 Oct 11;37(19):3380-3381. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab210.
8
A systematic analysis of read-across within REACH registration dossiers.
Comput Toxicol. 2024 Jun;30:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100304.
10
Towards systematic read-across using Generalised Read-Across (GenRA).
Comput Toxicol. 2023 Feb;25:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100258.

引用本文的文献

2
Towards systematic read-across using Generalised Read-Across (GenRA).
Comput Toxicol. 2023 Feb;25:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100258.
5
Navigating Transcriptomic Connectivity Mapping Workflows to Link Chemicals with Bioactivities.
Chem Res Toxicol. 2022 Nov 21;35(11):1929-1949. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00245. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
7
Evaluation of Variability Across Rat Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity Studies.
Toxicol Sci. 2022 Jun 28;188(1):34-47. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfac042.
9
Generalized Read-Across prediction using genra-py.
Bioinformatics. 2021 Oct 11;37(19):3380-3381. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab210.
10
An evaluation of the performance of selected (Q)SARs/expert systems for predicting acute oral toxicity.
Comput Toxicol. 2020 Nov;16. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2020.100135. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

本文引用的文献

2
Exploring current read-across applications and needs among selected U.S. Federal Agencies.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;106:197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 10.
3
Nonanimal Models for Acute Toxicity Evaluations: Applying Data-Driven Profiling and Read-Across.
Environ Health Perspect. 2019 Apr;127(4):47001. doi: 10.1289/EHP3614.
4
Generalized Read-Across (GenRA): A workflow implemented into the EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard.
ALTEX. 2019;36(3):462-465. doi: 10.14573/altex.1811292. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
5
Prediction of Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity Using a Multifingerprint Similarity Approach.
Toxicol Sci. 2019 Feb 1;167(2):484-495. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy255.
6
7
Status of acute systemic toxicity testing requirements and data uses by U.S. regulatory agencies.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;94:183-196. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.022. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
8
The CompTox Chemistry Dashboard: a community data resource for environmental chemistry.
J Cheminform. 2017 Nov 28;9(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13321-017-0247-6.
9
Deep Learning Based Regression and Multiclass Models for Acute Oral Toxicity Prediction with Automatic Chemical Feature Extraction.
J Chem Inf Model. 2017 Nov 27;57(11):2672-2685. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00244. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
10
QSAR Modelling of Rat Acute Toxicity on the Basis of PASS Prediction.
Mol Inform. 2011 Mar 14;30(2-3):241-50. doi: 10.1002/minf.201000151. Epub 2011 Mar 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验