Huynh Lisa, Chang Richard G, Chhatre Akhil, Sayeed Yusef, MacVicar John, McCormick Zachary L, Duszynski Belinda, Smith Clark
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Section, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, USA.
Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25;22(7):1496-1502. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab002.
Examine how interventional pain physicians navigated the early phase of reopening practices during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
In June/July 2020, Spine Intervention Society members were queried about practice demographics, perception of COVID-19 prevalence, financial impact, and implementation of new tools and procedures when re-opening practices.
Of the 2,295 members approached, 195 (8%) completed the survey. A majority (71%) reported using risk stratification tools and changing scheduling patterns. Nearly 70% performed initial assessments via telehealth and 87% for follow-up encounters. More than 80% performed symptom/temperature checks upon in-person clinic/facility entrance, and 63% screened patients via phone. Most (58%) did not test patients for COVID-19 for office visits, while 38% tested only if symptomatic. For epidural injections, intra-articular injections, and radiofrequency neurotomy procedures, 43% reported not testing patients, while 36% tested patients only if symptomatic. Most (70%) required patients to wear a mask upon entering the clinic/facility. For nonprocedure encounters, respondents used surgical masks (85%), gloves (35%), face shields/goggles (24%), N95 respirators (15%), and gowns (6%). Some (66%) discussed unique COVID-19 risks/complications and 26% provided written information. Most did not make changes to steroid dosage (67%) or peri-procedural anticoagulation management (97%). The vast majority (81%) estimated that COVID-19 will have a moderate-severe financial impact on their practice.
COVID-19 has dramatically affected interventional pain practices with regard to telehealth, in-clinic precautions, screening/testing protocols, and patient counseling. Practice patterns will continue to evolve as we learn more about the disease and improve methods to provide safe and effective care.
研究介入疼痛科医生在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间如何应对重新开业的早期阶段。
2020年6月/7月,对脊柱介入协会成员进行了调查,询问其执业人口统计学信息、对COVID-19流行情况的认知、财务影响以及重新开业时新工具和程序的实施情况。
在2295名被邀请的成员中,195名(8%)完成了调查。大多数(71%)报告使用了风险分层工具并改变了排班模式。近70%的人通过远程医疗进行初始评估,87%用于随访。超过80%的人在患者进入门诊/机构时进行症状/体温检查,63%通过电话对患者进行筛查。大多数(58%)在门诊就诊时不对患者进行COVID-19检测,而38%仅在患者出现症状时进行检测。对于硬膜外注射、关节内注射和射频神经切断术,43%的人报告不对患者进行检测,而36%仅在患者出现症状时进行检测。大多数(70%)要求患者进入门诊/机构时佩戴口罩。对于非手术诊疗,受访者使用外科口罩(85%)、手套(35%)、面罩/护目镜(24%)、N95口罩(15%)和手术衣(6%)。一些人(66%)讨论了COVID-19的独特风险/并发症,26%提供了书面信息。大多数人没有改变类固醇剂量(67%)或围手术期抗凝管理(97%)。绝大多数(81%)估计COVID-19将对其执业产生中度至重度财务影响。
COVID-19在远程医疗、门诊预防措施、筛查/检测方案和患者咨询方面对介入疼痛诊疗产生了巨大影响。随着我们对该疾病了解的增多以及提供安全有效护理方法的改进,执业模式将继续演变。