Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Nashville, TN.
Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 Jul 1;87(3):971-977. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002662.
The 2013 Pooled Cohort Equations (PCEs) have underestimated cardiovascular disease (CVD) events among persons with HIV (PWH). We evaluate whether the addition of frailty improves PCE's ability to estimate CVD risk among aging PWH.
Multicenter study.
We assessed baseline frailty and 5-year atherosclerotic CVD risk using PCEs for participants in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5322 observational study. The primary outcome was incident CVD. We fit Cox proportional hazards regression models for incident CVD with (1) PCEs alone and (2) PCEs and frailty together (which included separate models for frailty score, frailty status, slow gait speed, and weak grip strength). We evaluated discrimination ability for the models with and without frailty by comparing their areas under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) and Uno C-statistics, as well as by calculating the net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement.
The analysis included 944 A5322 participants (759 men, 185 women, median age 50 years, 47% White non-Hispanic). Thirty-nine participants experienced incident CVD during the study period. PCEs predicted 5-year CVD risk in all models. With frailty score, frailty status, slow gait speed, or weak grip strength added, the AUC and C-statistics were relatively unchanged, and the NRI and integrated discrimination improvement indicated little improvement in model discrimination. However, frailty score independently predicted CVD risk [frailty score: hazard ratio = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.00 to 1.70, P = 0.05].
Frailty did not improve the predictive ability of PCEs. Baseline PCEs and frailty score independently predicted CVD. Incorporation of frailty assessment into clinical practice may provide corroborative and independent CVD risk estimation.
2013 年的合并队列方程(PCE)低估了艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)的心血管疾病(CVD)事件。我们评估了脆弱性的增加是否能改善 PCE 对老龄化 PWH 的 CVD 风险的估计能力。
多中心研究。
我们使用 AIDS 临床试验组 A5322 观察性研究的参与者的 PCE 评估了基线脆弱性和 5 年动脉粥样硬化性 CVD 风险。主要结果是 CVD 事件。我们使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型对 CVD 事件进行了分析,模型包括(1)仅 PCE 和(2)PCE 和脆弱性一起(包括脆弱性评分、脆弱性状态、缓慢的步态速度和握力弱的单独模型)。我们通过比较有无脆弱性的模型的曲线下面积(AUC)和 Uno C 统计量,以及计算净重新分类改善和综合鉴别改善,来评估有无脆弱性的模型的鉴别能力。
分析包括 944 名 A5322 参与者(759 名男性,185 名女性,中位年龄 50 岁,47%为白种非西班牙裔)。39 名参与者在研究期间发生了 CVD 事件。PCE 在所有模型中都预测了 5 年 CVD 风险。加入脆弱性评分、脆弱性状态、缓慢的步态速度或握力弱后,AUC 和 C 统计量相对不变,NRI 和综合鉴别改善表明模型鉴别能力略有提高。然而,脆弱性评分独立预测 CVD 风险[脆弱性评分:风险比=1.30,95%置信区间(CI)=1.00 至 1.70,P=0.05]。
脆弱性并没有改善 PCE 的预测能力。基线 PCE 和脆弱性评分独立预测 CVD。将脆弱性评估纳入临床实践可能提供补充和独立的 CVD 风险估计。