Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, 3647University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University of Applied Science, the Netherlands.
J Aging Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;33(7-8):482-492. doi: 10.1177/0898264321993321. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
Goal setting and motivational interviewing (MI) may increase well-being by promoting healthy behavior. Since we failed to show improved well-being in a proactive assessment service for community-dwelling older adults applying these techniques, we studied whether implementation processes could explain this. Goals set during the comprehensive geriatric assessment were evaluated on their potential for behavior change. MI and goal setting adherence wasassessed by reviewing audiotaped interactions and interviewing care professionals. Among the 280 goals set with 230 frail older adults (mean age 77 ± 6.9 years, 59% women), more than 90% had a low potential for behavior change. Quality thresholds for MI were reached in only one of the 11 interactions. Application was hindered by the context and the limited proficiency of care professionals. Implementation was suboptimal for goal setting and MI. This decreased the potential for improved well-being in the participating older adults.
目标设定和动机性访谈(MI)可以通过促进健康行为来提高幸福感。由于我们在为社区居住的老年人提供的主动评估服务中应用这些技术未能显示出幸福感的改善,因此我们研究了实施过程是否可以解释这一点。在全面老年评估期间设定的目标评估了其行为改变的潜力。通过审查录音交互和采访护理专业人员来评估 MI 和目标设定的依从性。在 230 名脆弱老年人(平均年龄 77 ± 6.9 岁,59%为女性)设定的 280 个目标中,超过 90%的目标改变行为的可能性较低。仅在 11 次交互中的 1 次中达到了 MI 的质量阈值。由于背景和护理专业人员的能力有限,应用受到阻碍。目标设定和 MI 的实施并不理想。这降低了参与的老年人幸福感改善的潜力。