Fox Sarah T, Demichelis Olivia, Pond Constance Dimity, Janda Monika, Hubbard Ruth E
Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Internal Medicine Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2024 Dec;54(12):1990-2008. doi: 10.1111/imj.16535. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
Little is known about what components geriatricians routinely incorporate into outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs).
This study explored what components of CGAs are routinely incorporated into geriatricians' letters and assessed their consistency with the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) and a recently published survey of geriatricians.
We completed a manual content analysis, supplemented by qualitative thematic analysis, of 34 letters from five geriatricians, collected as part of the GOAL Trial.
While more than 80% of letters included each of the key clinical domains described in the Medicare Benefits Schedule and survey of geriatricians, only 62% included advanced care planning and 47% mentioned immunisations. Forty-seven percent of letters included goal setting. Few letters showed evidence of multidisciplinary working. Issues identified by the geriatrician centred around the themes of advance care planning, symptom identification and management, medical comorbidities, strategies to support quality of life and interventions to manage frailty. Patient concerns identified in the letters were cognition and mood, declining function, future planning and symptom management.
Analysis of geriatricians' letters provides important and novel insights into usual CGA practice. The letters provide evidence of multidimensional assessments of physical, functional, social and psychological health, and most include use of standardised tools. However, less than 50% include evidence of goal setting or multidisciplinary working. The results allow consideration of how CGAs might be carried out in the outpatient setting, so that interventions focused on improving the quality and efficacy of this intervention can be implemented.
对于老年医学专家在门诊综合老年评估(CGA)中常规纳入哪些组成部分,人们了解甚少。
本研究探讨了CGA的哪些组成部分被常规纳入老年医学专家的信函中,并评估了它们与医疗保险福利计划(MBS)以及最近发表的老年医学专家调查的一致性。
作为GOAL试验的一部分,我们对来自五位老年医学专家的34封信函进行了人工内容分析,并辅以定性主题分析。
虽然超过80%的信函包含了医疗保险福利计划和老年医学专家调查中描述的每个关键临床领域,但只有62%的信函包含了临终关怀规划,47%提到了免疫接种。47%的信函包含了目标设定。很少有信函显示出多学科协作的证据。老年医学专家确定的问题集中在临终关怀规划、症状识别与管理、合并症、支持生活质量的策略以及管理衰弱的干预措施等主题上。信函中确定患者关注的问题是认知和情绪、功能下降、未来规划和症状管理。
对老年医学专家信函的分析为常规CGA实践提供了重要且新颖的见解。这些信函提供了对身体、功能、社会和心理健康进行多维度评估的证据,并且大多数包括使用标准化工具。然而,不到50%的信函包含目标设定或多学科协作的证据。研究结果有助于思考如何在门诊环境中开展CGA,从而能够实施旨在提高该干预质量和效果的干预措施。