Skåne Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Malmö, Sweden.
Skåne Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Unit for Pediatric Bipolar & Psychotic Disorders, Lund, Sweden.
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Mar;93(1):107-136. doi: 10.1007/s11126-021-09887-x. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
Restraints and seclusions are restrictive interventions used in psychiatric inpatient units when there is an imminent risk of harm to the patient or others. Coercive measures are controversial and can lead to negative consequences, including negative emotions, re-traumatization, injuries, or death. The article summarizes the last 10 years of literature regarding methods and strategies used for reducing seclusions and restraints in child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient units, and reports on their outcomes. The literature was reviewed by searching PubMed and PsycInfo for English-language articles published between May 2010 and May 2020. Eighteen articles were found that described methods or strategies aimed at reducing restraint or seclusion utilization in child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient units. The following interventions were evaluated: Trauma-Informed Care (TIC), Six Core Strategies, Child and Family Centered Care (CFCC), Collaborative & Proactive Solutions (CPS), Strength-Based Care, Modified Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (M-PBIS), Behavioral Modification Program (BMP), Autism Spectrum Disorder Care Pathway (ASD-CP), Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), sensory rooms, Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Training (MBSR) of staff, and Milieu Nurse-Client Shift Assignments. Most of the interventions reduced the use of seclusions and/or restraints. Two child-centered and trauma-informed initiatives eliminated the use of mechanical restraints. This review shows that the use of coercive measures can be reduced and should be prioritized. Successful implementation requires ongoing commitment on all levels of an organization and a willingness to learn. To facilitate comparisons, future models should evaluate different standardized parameters.
约束和隔离是精神科住院病房在患者或他人有即将受到伤害的风险时使用的限制干预措施。强制性措施存在争议,可能会导致负面后果,包括负面情绪、再次创伤、伤害或死亡。本文总结了过去 10 年来有关减少儿童和青少年精神病住院病房约束和隔离的方法和策略的文献,并报告了其结果。通过在 PubMed 和 PsycInfo 上搜索 2010 年 5 月至 2020 年 5 月期间发表的英文文章,对文献进行了回顾。共找到了 18 篇描述旨在减少儿童和青少年精神病住院病房约束和隔离使用的方法或策略的文章。评估了以下干预措施:创伤知情护理(TIC)、六个核心策略、儿童和家庭为中心的护理(CFCC)、合作和积极解决方案(CPS)、以强项为基础的护理、改良的积极行为干预和支持(M-PBIS)、行为修正方案(BMP)、自闭症谱系障碍护理途径(ASD-CP)、辩证行为疗法(DBT)、感官室、员工正念减压训练(MBSR)和环境护士-客户轮班分配。大多数干预措施减少了约束和/或隔离的使用。两项以儿童为中心和以创伤为导向的举措消除了机械约束的使用。本综述表明,可以减少强制性措施的使用,应优先考虑。成功实施需要组织各级的持续承诺和学习意愿。为了便于比较,未来的模型应评估不同的标准化参数。