Moell Astrid, Rozental Alexander, Buchmayer Susanne, Kaltiala Riittakerttu, Långström Niklas
Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06690-x.
Understanding factors influencing the use of coercive practices in clinical psychiatry is necessary to develop strategies to reduce their use. However, there is little evidence regarding staff perceptions of such factors, particularly in inpatient child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP).
We conducted semi-structured interviews with nurses, senior consultants and heads of units in inpatient CAP in Sweden 2021 (N = 9). The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Data on informal coercion were analysed separately using a deductive approach based on previously proposed hierarchies for informal coercion.
We identified one overarching theme of factors reported to influence the use of coercive practices: "Trust and distrust in coercive and non-coercive approaches", in turn encompassing the two subthemes "Ward culture" and "Available resources and strain". Our findings suggest a risk of a negative spiral of coercion emerging when there is low professional trust in non-coercive approaches and high trust in coercive methods. Informal coercion was used frequently and observed to occur in two distinct processes: one concerning continuous coercive escalation, and the other involving sustained efforts at the same coercion level.
Trusting the efficacy of non-coercive approaches in inpatient CAP care appears critical for their success; a finding that may inform strategies to reduce coercion and address frequent use with individual patients.
了解影响临床精神病学中强制手段使用的因素对于制定减少其使用的策略至关重要。然而,关于工作人员对这些因素的看法的证据很少,尤其是在住院儿童和青少年精神病学(CAP)领域。
2021年,我们对瑞典住院CAP科室的护士、高级顾问和科室主任进行了半结构式访谈(N = 9)。访谈内容逐字记录,并采用反思性主题分析法进行分析。关于非正式强制手段的数据,采用基于先前提出的非正式强制手段层次结构的演绎法进行单独分析。
我们确定了一个总体主题,即据报告影响强制手段使用的因素:“对强制和非强制方法的信任与不信任”,该主题又包含“病房文化”和“可用资源与压力”两个子主题。我们的研究结果表明,当对非强制方法的专业信任度低而对强制方法的信任度高时,存在出现负面强制螺旋的风险。非正式强制手段使用频繁,且观察到其发生在两个不同的过程中:一个涉及持续的强制升级,另一个涉及在同一强制水平上的持续努力。
相信非强制方法在住院CAP护理中的有效性似乎对其成功至关重要;这一发现可能为减少强制手段以及解决对个别患者频繁使用强制手段的策略提供参考。