• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旁观者对基于偏见的欺凌和报复的反应:报复是否比基于偏见的欺凌更被认为是可以接受的?

Bystander responses to bias-based bullying and retaliation: Is retaliation perceived as more acceptable than bias-based bullying?

机构信息

North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Br J Dev Psychol. 2021 Sep;39(3):442-461. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12371. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1111/bjdp.12371
PMID:33629758
Abstract

The current study examined intergroup-related and social-cognitive correlates of bystanders' acceptability judgements and their responses to bias-based bullying of immigrant peers and to possible retaliation for the bullying. Participants included 179 immigrant-origin and non-immigrant-origin youth (M  = 13.23; SD = 1.55; 79 immigrant-origin youth). Participants' bystander judgements and responses to bullying and retaliation were examined via a hypothetical scenario. Further, participants' intergroup attitudes towards immigrants and their social-cognitive skills were evaluated. ANOVA results showed that immigrant-origin youth judged bullying as less acceptable and retaliation as more acceptable compared to non-immigrant-origin youth, documenting that group membership is related to adolescents' judgements. A similar pattern was observed in active bystander responses. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that immigration background, intergroup process in the context of immigration, and social-cognitive skills predict bystander responses to bullying and retaliation. This study provides important implications for anti-bullying intervention programmes to overcome the negative consequences of retaliation in the escalation of aggressive behaviours.

摘要

本研究考察了旁观者对移民同伴基于偏见的欺凌行为及其可能报复行为的可接受性判断及其反应的群体间相关和社会认知相关性。参与者包括 179 名移民和非移民背景的青少年(M=13.23;SD=1.55;79 名移民背景的青少年)。通过假设情景来检验参与者对欺凌和报复的旁观者判断和反应。此外,还评估了参与者对移民的群体间态度和他们的社会认知技能。方差分析结果表明,与非移民背景的青少年相比,移民背景的青少年认为欺凌行为的可接受性较低,而报复行为的可接受性较高,这表明群体归属与青少年的判断有关。在积极的旁观者反应中也观察到了类似的模式。分层回归分析表明,移民背景、移民背景下的群体间过程和社会认知技能可以预测对欺凌和报复的旁观者反应。本研究为反欺凌干预计划提供了重要意义,以克服报复在攻击性行为升级中的负面影响。

相似文献

1
Bystander responses to bias-based bullying and retaliation: Is retaliation perceived as more acceptable than bias-based bullying?旁观者对基于偏见的欺凌和报复的反应:报复是否比基于偏见的欺凌更被认为是可以接受的?
Br J Dev Psychol. 2021 Sep;39(3):442-461. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12371. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
The Role of Immigration Background, Intergroup Processes, and Social-Cognitive Skills in Bystanders' Responses to Bias-Based Bullying Toward Immigrants During Adolescence.移民背景、群体间过程和社会认知技能在青少年旁观者对针对移民的基于偏见的欺凌行为的反应中的作用。
Child Dev. 2021 May;92(3):e296-e316. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13476. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
3
What motivates adolescent bystanders to intervene when immigrant youth are bullied?是什么促使青少年旁观者在移民青少年被欺负时进行干预?
J Res Adolesc. 2023 Jun;33(2):603-617. doi: 10.1111/jora.12829. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
4
Do Adolescents Intervene in Intergroup Bias-based Bullying? Bystander Judgments and Responses to Intergroup Bias-based Bullying of Refugees.青少年会干预基于群体偏见的欺凌行为吗?对基于群体偏见的难民欺凌行为的旁观者判断和反应。
J Res Adolesc. 2023 Mar;33(1):4-23. doi: 10.1111/jora.12752. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
5
Adolescents' Expectations for Types of Victim Retaliation Following Direct Bullying.青少年对直接欺凌后受害者报复类型的期望。
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Mar;52(3):533-546. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01710-5. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
6
School and Family Factors Predicting Adolescent Cognition Regarding Bystander Intervention in Response to Bullying and Victim Retaliation.学校和家庭因素预测青少年对欺凌和报复行为的旁观者干预的认知。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Mar;48(3):581-596. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0941-3. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
Theory of Mind as a Correlate of Bystanders' Reasoning About Intergroup Bullying of Syrian Refugee Youth.心理理论与旁观者对叙利亚难民青年群体间欺凌行为的推理之间的关联
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 30;13:815639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815639. eCollection 2022.
8
Bystander responses in five-steps: Paving road to prosocial intervention to social exclusion through social-cognition.旁观者反应五步骤:通过社会认知为亲社会干预和社会排斥铺平道路。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2024 Nov;42(4):517-523. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12513. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
9
The Silver Lining in the Dark Cloud of Social Status Insecurity: The Mediating Role of Popularity Goals in the Association Between Social Status Insecurity and Chinese Adolescents' Bullying Bystander Behaviors.社会地位不安全感的乌云中的一线希望:受欢迎目标在社会地位不安全感与中国青少年欺凌旁观者行为之间的中介作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Sep;37(17-18):NP15851-NP15873. doi: 10.1177/08862605211023489. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
10
Bystanders' responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying: The role of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression.旁观者对线下欺凌和网络欺凌的反应:同理心和关于攻击行为的规范信念的作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2016 Apr;57(2):169-76. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12277.

引用本文的文献

1
Literature Review and Content Analysis of Bullying Assessments: Are We Measuring What We Intend to?欺凌评估的文献综述与内容分析:我们所测量的是我们想要测量的吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 29;22(1):29. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010029.
2
Challenging the Exclusion of Immigrant Peers.挑战对移民同龄人(或同伴)的排斥。
Int J Behav Dev. 2023 Jan;47(1):9-20. doi: 10.1177/01650254221128275. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
Theory of Mind as a Correlate of Bystanders' Reasoning About Intergroup Bullying of Syrian Refugee Youth.心理理论与旁观者对叙利亚难民青年群体间欺凌行为的推理之间的关联
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 30;13:815639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815639. eCollection 2022.