• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新进行演示。

Redoing the Demos.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Jan;51 Suppl 1:S58-S63. doi: 10.1002/hast.1231.

DOI:10.1002/hast.1231
PMID:33630338
Abstract

Forces including extreme economic inequality, cultural polarization, and the monetizing and privatizing of persons as commodities are undermining the forms of moral recognition and mutuality upon which democratic practices and institutions depend. These underlying factors, together with more direct modes of political corruption, manipulation, and authoritarian nationalism, are undoing Western democracies. This essay identifies and explores some vital underpinnings of democratic citizenship and civic learning that remain open to revitalization and repair. Building care structures and practices from the ground up and developing inclusive and egalitarian modes of solidarity in a pluralistic society are the focus of discussion. The essay argues that solidarity and care are essential relationships and practices of moral recognition upon which democratic political agency and freedom rest. The social-relational lifeworld and the democratic lifeworld are interdependent. Democratic citizenship is itself a relational practice that supports other practices. Democratic governance properly carried out fosters an underlying social solidarity and care and in turn draws moral and political legitimacy upward from them.

摘要

包括极端经济不平等、文化极化以及将人作为商品进行货币化和私有化在内的各种力量正在破坏民主实践和制度所依赖的道德认同和相互关系形式。这些潜在因素,再加上更直接的政治腐败、操纵和威权民族主义模式,正在颠覆西方民主。本文确定并探讨了一些仍然可以恢复活力和修复的民主公民身份和公民学习的重要基础。从基础开始构建关怀结构和实践,并在多元化社会中发展包容和平等的团结模式,是讨论的重点。本文认为,团结和关怀是民主政治代理和自由所依赖的道德认同的必要关系和实践。社会关系生活世界和民主生活世界是相互依存的。民主公民身份本身就是一种支持其他实践的关系实践。民主治理的正确实施促进了潜在的社会团结和关怀,反过来又从这些团结和关怀中汲取道德和政治合法性。

相似文献

1
Redoing the Demos.重新进行演示。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Jan;51 Suppl 1:S58-S63. doi: 10.1002/hast.1231.
2
Civic Learning for a Democracy in Crisis.危机中的民主公民学习。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Jan;51 Suppl 1:S2-S4. doi: 10.1002/hast.1221.
3
A Bioethics for Democracy: Restoring Civic Vision.民主的生命伦理学:恢复公民愿景。
Perspect Biol Med. 2022;65(4):646-653. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2022.0056.
4
From the urban to the civic: the moral possibilities of the city.从城市走向公民社会:城市的道德可能性
J Urban Health. 2001 Mar;78(1):88-103. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.1.88.
5
Recommendations for Better Civic Learning: Building and Rebuilding Democracy.《更好的公民学习建议:建设和重建民主》。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Jan;51 Suppl 1:S64-S75. doi: 10.1002/hast.1232.
6
Where civics meets science: building science for the public good through Civic Science.公民科学:通过公民科学为公共利益服务
Oral Dis. 2017 Sep;23(6):692-696. doi: 10.1111/odi.12534. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
7
Understanding the role of nationalism in "new democracies".理解民族主义在“新民主国家”中的作用。
Coll Antropol. 1999 Jun;23(1):231-47.
8
Theoretical underpinnings of state institutionalisation of inclusion and struggles in collective health in Latin America.拉丁美洲融入式国家体制化的理论基础与集体卫生领域的斗争。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Jun-Jul;14(6-7):863-874. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1455886. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
9
Why do democracies respond differently to COVID-19? A comparison of the United States and South Korea.为什么民主国家对 COVID-19 的反应不同?以美国和韩国为例的比较。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 15;11:1285552. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1285552. eCollection 2023.
10
Bioethics and Populism: How Should Our Field Respond?生物伦理学与民粹主义:我们的领域应如何应对?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2017 Mar;47(2):11-16. doi: 10.1002/hast.684.