• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管胃吻合口并发症的发生率及其处理:食管胃吻合口评估(OGAA)的结果。

Rates of Anastomotic Complications and Their Management Following Esophagectomy: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):e382-e391. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004649.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004649
PMID:33630459
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to characterize rates and management of anastomotic leak (AL) and conduit necrosis (CN) after esophagectomy in an international cohort.

BACKGROUND

Outcomes in patients with anastomotic complications of esophagectomy are currently uncertain. Optimum strategies to manage AL/CN are unknown, and have not been assessed in an international cohort.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter cohort study included patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between April 2018 and December 2018 (with 90 days of follow-up). The primary outcomes were AL and CN, as defined by the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group. The secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality and successful AL/CN management, defined as patients being alive at 90 day postoperatively, and requiring no further AL/CN treatment.

RESULTS

This study included 2247 esophagectomies across 137 hospitals in 41 countries. The AL rate was 14.2% (n = 319) and CN rate was 2.7% (n = 60). The overall 90-day mortality rate for patients with AL was 11.3%, and increased significantly with severity of AL (Type 1: 3.2% vs. Type 2: 13.2% vs. Type 3: 24.7%, P < 0.001); a similar trend was observed for CN. Of the 329 patients with AL/CN, primary management was successful in 69.6% of cases. Subsequent rounds of management lead to an increase in the rate of successful treatment, with cumulative success rates of 85.4% and 88.1% after secondary and tertiary management, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patient outcomes worsen significantly with increasing AL and CN severity. Reintervention after failed primary anastomotic complication management can be successful, hence surgeons should not be deterred from trying alternative management strategies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对国际队列中食管切除术后吻合口漏(AL)和吻合口/移植物坏死(CN)的发生率和处理方法进行分析。

背景

目前,食管切除术后吻合口并发症患者的结局尚不确定。处理 AL/CN 的最佳策略尚不清楚,且尚未在国际队列中进行评估。

方法

本前瞻性多中心队列研究纳入了 2018 年 4 月至 2018 年 12 月期间因食管癌行食管切除术的患者(随访 90 天)。主要结局为吻合口并发症共识组定义的 AL 和 CN。次要结局包括 90 天死亡率和 AL/CN 处理成功,定义为术后 90 天存活且无需进一步 AL/CN 治疗的患者。

结果

本研究纳入了来自 41 个国家 137 家医院的 2247 例食管切除术患者。AL 发生率为 14.2%(n=319),CN 发生率为 2.7%(n=60)。AL 患者的总体 90 天死亡率为 11.3%,且随着 AL 严重程度的增加而显著升高(1 型:3.2%;2 型:13.2%;3 型:24.7%,P<0.001);CN 也存在类似趋势。329 例 AL/CN 患者中,初次处理成功率为 69.6%。再次处理可提高治疗成功率,二级和三级处理后的累积成功率分别为 85.4%和 88.1%。

结论

随着 AL 和 CN 严重程度的增加,患者结局显著恶化。初次吻合口并发症处理失败后的再次干预可能成功,因此外科医生不应因尝试替代处理策略而退缩。

相似文献

1
Rates of Anastomotic Complications and Their Management Following Esophagectomy: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).食管胃吻合口并发症的发生率及其处理:食管胃吻合口评估(OGAA)的结果。
Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):e382-e391. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004649.
2
Predictors of anastomotic leak and conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy: Results from the oesophago-gastric anastomosis audit (OGAA).食管胃吻合口漏和吻合口处导管坏死的预测因素:来自食管胃吻合口审计(OGAA)的结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;50(6):107983. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.107983. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
3
Study protocol for a multicenter prospective cohort study on esophagogastric anastomoses and anastomotic leak (the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit/OGAA).多中心前瞻性队列研究食管胃吻合术和吻合口漏的研究方案(食管胃吻合口评估/OGAA)。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Jan 16;33(1). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz007.
4
Mortality from esophagectomy for esophageal cancer across low, middle, and high-income countries: An international cohort study.食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的死亡率:一项国际队列研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jun;47(6):1481-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.12.006. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
5
Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database.食管切除术后吻合口漏的预测因素:胸外科医师学会普通胸科数据库分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;96(6):1919-26. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.119. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
6
International Variation in Surgical Practices in Units Performing Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Unit Survey from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).国际上施行食管癌切除术的单位的手术操作差异:来自食管胃吻合口质量评估(OGAA)的单位调查。
World J Surg. 2019 Nov;43(11):2874-2884. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05080-1.
7
End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.食管癌切除术后端对端与端侧食管胃吻合术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Ann Surg. 2011 Aug;254(2):226-33. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822676a9.
8
Gastric Ischemic Conditioning Prior to Esophagectomy Is Associated with Decreased Stricture Rate and Overall Anastomotic Complications.胃缺血预处理与减少食管切除术后狭窄率和吻合口总并发症相关。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Sep;22(9):1501-1507. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3817-7. Epub 2018 May 29.
9
Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA).国际食管胃吻合口评估(OGAA)、食管切除术并发症共识小组(ECCG)和荷兰上消化道癌评估(DUCA)的短期结果比较。
BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab010.
10
Validation of the NUn score as a predictor of anastomotic leak and major complications after Esophagectomy.NUn 评分预测食管癌术后吻合口漏和主要并发症的验证。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Jan 16;33(1). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz041.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel stepwise and continuous high-volume irrigation drainage technique for managing cervical anastomotic leaks post-esophagectomy.一种用于食管切除术后处理颈部吻合口漏的新型分步连续高容量冲洗引流技术。
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):4957-4968. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2158. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
2
Evaluation of sarcopenia and myosteatosis to determine the impact on mortality after emergency laparotomy.评估肌肉减少症和肌脂肪变性以确定急诊剖腹手术后对死亡率的影响。
BJS Open. 2025 Jul 1;9(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf092.
3
VacStent as a novel therapeutic approach for esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks- a systematic review of the literature.
VacStent作为食管穿孔和吻合口漏的一种新型治疗方法——文献系统综述
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 21;25(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03067-5.
4
Addressing Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy: Insights from a Specialized Unit.食管癌切除术后吻合口漏的处理:来自一个专业科室的见解
J Clin Med. 2025 May 25;14(11):3694. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113694.
5
Postoperative outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international cohort study from the Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).微创食管切除术后的手术结局:来自食管胃吻合术审计(OGAA)的一项国际队列研究
BMC Surg. 2025 May 22;25(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02941-6.
6
The value of perioperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio combined with the prognostic nutritional index for predicting anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy.围手术期中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值联合预后营养指数在预测微创食管癌切除术后吻合口漏中的价值。
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Mar 31;17(3):1673-1683. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-302. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
7
The Impact of EndoVAC in Addressing Post-Esophagectomy Anastomotic Leak in Esophageal Cancer Management.EndoVAC在食管癌治疗中解决食管切除术后吻合口漏问题的影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 25;13(23):7113. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237113.
8
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Malignant Nodal Involvement in Early Esophago-Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Results From the Multicenter Retrospective Congress Study (endosCopic resectiON, esophaGectomy or Gastrectomy for Early Esophagogastric Cancers).早期食管胃腺癌恶性淋巴结受累的患病率及危险因素:多中心回顾性国会研究(早期食管胃癌的内镜切除、食管切除术或胃切除术)结果
Ann Surg. 2025 Mar 1;281(3):363-370. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006496. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
9
Predictors and Significance of Readmission after Esophagogastric Surgery: A Nationwide Analysis.食管胃手术后再入院的预测因素及意义:一项全国性分析。
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Jan 26;5(1):e363. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000363. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Systemic Inflammatory Response and the Noble and Underwood (NUn) Score as Early Predictors of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Reconstructive Surgery.全身炎症反应与诺布尔和安德伍德(NUn)评分作为食管重建术后吻合口漏的早期预测指标
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 31;13(3):826. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030826.