Evans Richard Pt, Kamarajah Sivesh K, Evison Felicity, Zou Xiaoxu, Coupland Ben, Griffiths Ewen A
From the Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK.
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Jan 26;5(1):e363. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000363. eCollection 2024 Mar.
The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for readmission after elective esophagogastric cancer surgery and characterize the impact of readmission on long-term survival. The study will also identify whether the location of readmission to either the hospital that performed the primary surgery (index hospital) or another institution (nonindex hospital) has an impact on postoperative mortality.
Over the past decade, the center-volume relationship has driven the centralization of major cancer surgery, which has led to improvements in perioperative mortality. However, the impact of readmission, especially to nonindex centers, on long-term mortality remains unclear.
This was a national population-based cohort study using Hospital Episode Statistics of adult patients undergoing esophagectomy and gastrectomy in England between January 2008 and December 2019.
This study included 27,592 patients, of which overall readmission rates were 25.1% (index 15.3% and nonindex 9.8%). The primary cause of readmission to an index hospital was surgical in 45.2% and 23.7% in nonindex readmissions. Patients with no readmissions had significantly longer survival than those with readmissions (median: 4.5 3.8 years; < 0.001). Patients readmitted to their index hospital had significantly improved survival as compared to nonindex readmissions (median: 3.3 4.7 years; < 0.001). Minimally invasive surgery and surgery performed in high-volume centers had improved 90-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.75; < 0.001; odds ratio, 0.60; < 0.001).
Patients requiring readmission to the hospital after surgery have an increased risk of mortality, which is worsened by readmission to a nonindex institution. Patients requiring readmission to the hospital should be assessed and admitted, if required, to their index institution.
本研究旨在确定择期食管癌和胃癌手术后再入院的风险因素,并描述再入院对长期生存的影响。该研究还将确定再入院至进行初次手术的医院(索引医院)或另一机构(非索引医院)是否对术后死亡率有影响。
在过去十年中,中心手术量关系推动了重大癌症手术的集中化,这导致围手术期死亡率有所改善。然而,再入院,尤其是再入院至非索引中心,对长期死亡率的影响仍不明确。
这是一项基于全国人口的队列研究,使用了2008年1月至2019年12月期间在英格兰接受食管切除术和胃切除术的成年患者的医院事件统计数据。
本研究纳入了27592例患者,总体再入院率为25.1%(索引医院15.3%,非索引医院9.8%)。再入院至索引医院的主要原因是手术相关的占45.2%,再入院至非索引医院的占23.7%。未再入院的患者比再入院的患者生存时间显著更长(中位数:4.5对3.8年;P<0.001)。与再入院至非索引医院的患者相比,再入院至索引医院的患者生存情况显著改善(中位数:3.3对4.7年;P<0.001)。微创手术和在高手术量中心进行的手术可降低90天死亡率(比值比,0.75;P<0.001;比值比,0.60;P<0.001)。
手术后需要再入院的患者死亡风险增加,而再入院至非索引机构会使情况恶化。需要再入院的患者应接受评估,如有需要,应入住其索引机构。