Suppr超能文献

是什么真正影响了本科 STEM 教育中主动学习的使用?来自化学、数学和物理教师的全国调查结果。

What really impacts the use of active learning in undergraduate STEM education? Results from a national survey of chemistry, mathematics, and physics instructors.

机构信息

School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.

Mallinson Institute for Science Education, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247544. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Six common beliefs about the usage of active learning in introductory STEM courses are investigated using survey data from 3769 instructors. Three beliefs focus on contextual factors: class size, classroom setup, and teaching evaluations; three focus on individual factors: security of employment, research activity, and prior exposure. The analysis indicates that instructors in all situations can and do employ active learning in their courses. However, with the exception of security of employment, trends in the data are consistent with beliefs about the impact of these factors on usage of active learning. We discuss implications of these results for institutional and departmental policies to facilitate the use of active learning.

摘要

对 3769 名教师的调查数据调查了关于在 STEM 入门课程中使用主动学习的六个常见误解。其中三个观点集中在背景因素上:班级规模、课堂设置和教学评估;另外三个观点集中在个人因素上:就业保障、研究活动和先前的经验。分析表明,所有情况下的教师都可以在课程中使用主动学习。然而,除了就业保障外,数据中的趋势与这些因素对主动学习使用的影响的看法一致。我们讨论了这些结果对机构和部门政策的影响,以促进主动学习的使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验