Psychology of Language Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Neurobiology of Language Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;32(3):459-465. doi: 10.1177/0956797620971652. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
Written language, a human cultural invention, is far too recent a development for dedicated neural infrastructure to have evolved in its service. Newly acquired cultural skills, such as reading, thus recycle evolutionarily older circuits that originally evolved for different, but similar, functions (e.g., visual object recognition). The predicts that this neuronal recycling has detrimental behavioral effects on the cognitive functions for which a cortical network originally evolved. In a study with 97 literate, low-literate, and illiterate participants from the same socioeconomic background, we found that even after adjusting for cognitive ability and test-taking familiarity, learning to read was associated with an increase, rather than a decrease, in object-recognition abilities. These results are incompatible with the claim that neuronal recycling results in destructive competition and are consistent with the possibility that learning to read instead fine-tunes general object-recognition mechanisms, a hypothesis that needs further neuroscientific investigation.
书面语言是人类的一项文化发明,出现的时间太过短暂,还不足以进化出专门的神经基础架构来为其服务。新习得的文化技能,如阅读,因此会重复利用最初为不同但相似的功能(例如视觉物体识别)而进化的古老回路。该假说预测,这种神经元再利用会对皮质网络最初进化而来的认知功能产生不利的行为影响。在一项对来自相同社会经济背景的 97 名受过教育、文化程度较低和未受过教育的参与者进行的研究中,我们发现,即使在调整了认知能力和考试熟悉度后,学习阅读也与物体识别能力的提高而非降低相关。这些结果与神经元再利用导致破坏性竞争的说法不一致,而与学习阅读反而可以微调一般物体识别机制的可能性一致,这一假设需要进一步的神经科学研究。