Ratib O M, Mankovich N J
Department of Radiological Sciences, UCLA School of Medicine 90024.
Radiology. 1988 Jun;167(3):743-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.167.3.3363133.
The authors assessed the performance of an automatic and rapid coronary quantification method by evaluating its accuracy in a stenosis phantom. Measurements were obtained with a lucite phantom with 2-, 3-, and 4-mm vessel diameters and concentric stenoses of 33%, 50%, 67%, and 75%. Direct digital angiographic images as well as 10 X 10 spot films and 35-mm cine angiography films were acquired with and without structural noise and mask subtraction. The films were digitized with magnification factors of one and two. An interactive analysis program was used to automatically determine the vessel edges with a Gaussian fit to the cross-sectional density profiles perpendicular to the center line of the vessel. Relative changes of the densitometric cross-sectional area along the vessel were used to assess the percentage of stenosis. Densitometric measurements were comparable in both digital and cine angiograms (r = .99 and r = .98, respectively); however, diameter measurements showed a higher variability and were dependent on the amount of magnification applied to the images.
作者通过在狭窄模型中评估其准确性,来评价一种自动快速冠状动脉定量方法的性能。使用具有2毫米、3毫米和4毫米血管直径以及33%、50%、67%和75%同心狭窄的有机玻璃模型进行测量。在有和没有结构噪声以及掩模减法的情况下,获取直接数字血管造影图像以及10×10点片和35毫米电影血管造影胶片。胶片以放大倍数一和二进行数字化处理。使用一个交互式分析程序,通过对垂直于血管中心线的横截面密度分布进行高斯拟合来自动确定血管边缘。沿血管的密度测量横截面面积的相对变化用于评估狭窄百分比。密度测量在数字血管造影和电影血管造影中具有可比性(分别为r = 0.99和r = 0.98);然而,直径测量显示出更高的变异性,并且取决于应用于图像的放大倍数。