Department of Internal Medicine, 23336University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, 23336University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun;36(6):673-680. doi: 10.1177/0885066621994057. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
This study retrospectively compares the effectiveness of methylprednisolone to dexamethasone in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19) requiring intensive care.
This is an institutional review board approved cohort study in patients with COVID-19 requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Patients admitted and requiring oxygen supplementation were treated with no steroids, methylprednisolone, or dexamethasone.
This study takes place in the ICU's at a large, tertiary, public teaching hospital serving a primarily low-income community in urban Los Angeles.
All eligible patients admitted to the ICU for COVID-19 respiratory failure from March 1 to July 31, 2020 were included in this study.
A total of 262 patients were grouped as receiving usual care (n = 75), methylprednisolone dosed at least at 1mg/kg/day for ≥ 3 days (n = 104), or dexamethasone dosed at least at 6 mg for ≥7 days (n = 83).
All-cause mortality within 50 days of initial corticosteroid treatment as compared to usual care was calculated. The mortality effect was then stratified based on levels of respiratory support received by the patient. In this cohort of 262 patients with severe COVID-19, all-cause mortalities in the usual care, methylprednisolone, and dexamethasone groups were 41.3%, 16.4% and 26.5% at 50 days ( < 0.01) respectively. In patients requiring mechanical ventilation, mortality was 42% lower in the methylprednisolone group than in the dexamethasone group (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% CI: 0.235-0.956, = 0.0385).
In COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation, sufficiently dosed methylprednisolone can lead to a further decreased mortality as compared to dexamethasone.
本研究回顾性比较了甲基强的松龙和地塞米松在需要重症监护的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2 或 COVID-19)患者中的疗效。
这是一项机构审查委员会批准的 COVID-19 患者队列研究,这些患者需要入住重症监护病房(ICU)。入住并需要氧疗的患者接受无类固醇、甲基强的松龙或地塞米松治疗。
本研究在一家大型、三级、公立教学医院的 ICU 进行,该医院服务于洛杉矶市区以低收入人群为主的社区。
所有符合条件的因 COVID-19 呼吸衰竭而入住 ICU 的患者均纳入本研究,入组时间为 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 7 月 31 日。
共有 262 例患者分为接受常规治疗组(n = 75)、至少接受 1mg/kg/天甲基强的松龙治疗至少 3 天组(n = 104)和至少接受 6mg 地塞米松治疗至少 7 天组(n = 83)。
计算了初始皮质类固醇治疗后 50 天内的全因死亡率,并根据患者接受的呼吸支持水平对死亡率进行分层。在这组 262 例严重 COVID-19 患者中,常规治疗组、甲基强的松龙组和地塞米松组的全因死亡率分别为 50 天内的 41.3%、16.4%和 26.5%(<0.01)。在需要机械通气的患者中,与地塞米松组相比,甲基强的松龙组的死亡率降低了 42%(风险比 0.48,95%CI:0.235-0.956, = 0.0385)。
在需要机械通气的 COVID-19 患者中,与地塞米松相比,足量的甲基强的松龙可进一步降低死亡率。