Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 13;24(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09056-y.
Dexamethasone usually recommended for patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to reduce short-term mortality. However, it is uncertain if another corticosteroid, such as methylprednisolone, may be utilized to obtain better clinical outcome. This study assessed dexamethasone's clinical and safety outcomes compared to methylprednisolone.
A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted between March 01, 2020, and July 31, 2021. It included adult COVID-19 patients who were initiated on either dexamethasone or methylprednisolone therapy within 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The primary outcome was the progression of multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) on day three of ICU admission. Propensity score (PS) matching was used (1:3 ratio) based on the patient's age and MODS within 24 h of ICU admission.
After Propensity Score (PS) matching, 264 patients were included; 198 received dexamethasone, while 66 patients received methylprednisolone within 24 h of ICU admission. In regression analysis, patients who received methylprednisolone had a higher MODS on day three of ICU admission than those who received dexamethasone (beta coefficient: 0.17 (95% CI 0.02, 0.32), P = 0.03). Moreover, hospital-acquired infection was higher in the methylprednisolone group (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.01, 4.66; p = 0.04). On the other hand, the 30-day and the in-hospital mortality were not statistically significant different between the two groups.
Dexamethasone showed a lower MODS on day three of ICU admission compared to methylprednisolone, with no statistically significant difference in mortality.
地塞米松通常被推荐用于治疗严重的 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者,以降低短期死亡率。然而,目前尚不确定另一种皮质类固醇,如甲基泼尼松龙,是否可用于获得更好的临床结局。本研究评估了地塞米松与甲基泼尼松龙相比的临床和安全性结局。
这是一项多中心、回顾性队列研究,于 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2021 年 7 月 31 日进行。研究纳入了入住重症监护病房(ICU)后 24 小时内开始接受地塞米松或甲基泼尼松龙治疗的成年 COVID-19 患者。主要结局是 ICU 入住第 3 天多器官功能障碍评分(MODS)的进展。根据患者 ICU 入住后 24 小时内的年龄和 MODS,采用倾向评分(PS)匹配(1:3 比例)。
经 PS 匹配后,共纳入 264 例患者,198 例接受地塞米松治疗,66 例接受甲基泼尼松龙治疗。回归分析显示,与接受地塞米松治疗的患者相比,接受甲基泼尼松龙治疗的患者 ICU 入住第 3 天的 MODS 更高(β系数:0.17(95%CI 0.02,0.32),P=0.03)。此外,甲基泼尼松龙组的医院获得性感染发生率更高(OR 2.17,95%CI 1.01,4.66;P=0.04)。另一方面,两组间 30 天死亡率和住院死亡率无统计学差异。
与甲基泼尼松龙相比,地塞米松在 ICU 入住第 3 天的 MODS 更低,但死亡率无统计学差异。